My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09320
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:51 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:12:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
332
County
Mesa
Community
Palisade
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Palisade, Colorado
Date
7/1/1992
Designation Date
11/1/1992
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />only incidental flood protection to the Palisade area. However, <br />incidental storage, trans-mountain diversion, and irrigation uses <br />have served, and will probably continue to serve, in reducing peak <br />flows of very large floods in the study reach. Major reservoirs <br />controlling the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers above the Town of <br />Palisade are Granby, Green Mountain, Dillon, Williams Fork, Reudi, <br />Taylor Park, Vega, Paonia, Morrow Point, and Blue Mesa. <br /> <br />Floodplain regulations have been adopted by Palisade. Designated <br />floodplains, including floodway zones, are incorporated into zoning <br />maps. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied by detailed methods in the cOllUDuni ty, <br />standard hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine <br />the flood hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a <br />magni tude which are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the <br />average during any 10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (recurrence <br />interval) have been selected as having special significsnce for <br />floodplain management and for flood insurance rates. These events, <br />cOllUDonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1 <br />and 0.2 percent chance, respectively, of being equaled or exceeded <br />during any year. Al though the recurrence interval represents the long- <br />term, avera2e period between floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods <br />could occur at short intervals or even within the same year. The risk of <br />experiencing a rare flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are <br />considered. For example, the risk of having a flood which equals or <br />exceeds the 100-year flood (1 percent chance of annual exceedence) in <br />any 50-year period is approximately 40 percent (4 in 10); for any <br />90-year period, the risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in <br />10). The analyses reported herein reflect flooding potentials based on <br />conditions existing in the community at the time of completion of this <br />study. Maps and flood elevations will be amended periodically to <br />reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each flooding source studied by <br />detailed methods affecting the cOllUDunity. <br /> <br />The discharge values used were based on the results of the 1985 COE <br />hydrology report on the Colorado River from Glenwood Springs to <br />DeBeque Canyon (Reference 4). <br /> <br />A hydrology report dated May 1989 was prepared by J. F. Sato & <br />Associates, Inc., (Reference 5). In this study the peak discharges <br />along the Colorado River from DeBeque Canyon to the Utah State line <br />were analyzed. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.