Laserfiche WebLink
<br />overland flow. The velocity of over!<md flow can vary with surface cover and <br />tillage characteristics. If the slope and land use of the overland fIow reach <br />are knOI'."I1, travel time can be calculated using the followingequatio n: <br /> <br />T, '" 1.12 (1.1 - CIO) LM S~_lJ <br /> <br />Where: <br /> <br />ClO '" adjusted runoff coefficient for 10- <br />year flow; <br /> <br />L '" length of overland flow in feet; <br /> <br />S" slope of flow path lfi <br />percent; <br /> <br />T '" travel time in minutes or <br />, <br />time of concentration <br /> <br />Traveltime through a storm sewer, road gutter system or open channel is the <br />sum of travel times in each individual componelll of the drainage system. In <br />most cases. average velocities can be used without a significant loss of <br />aCCllracy. Times of concentration, calculated for fully developed land use, <br />should not be less than 5 minutes to avoid oversizing of inlets, storm sewers <br />and open channels to unrealistic levels. <br /> <br />Given a time of concentration, determination ufthe average int ensityofthe <br />precipitation for the period is made from a graph constructed fur <br />depth/duration versus time. A graph for the Cripple Creek area is shown as <br />Figure 2 in Appendix A, 'Time ' (ntensity - Frequency Curves.' <br /> <br />IV.II <br /> <br />5, <br /> <br />Peak Runoff Rates <br /> <br />It is realized that the Rational Method of predicting peak storm wat errunoff <br />rates may not be as predse a.~ other analytical methods. However, it is felt <br />that this method does result in reasonable estimates of peak runoff rate~. <br />Considering the assumptions which must be made with regard to land use. <br />proposed dcvelopment palterns and soil types, the use of morc sopbisticated <br />analytical techniques probably do not materially improve the preci~ion of the <br />peak storm water runoff quantities which have been developed. <br /> <br />Major drainage in the City of Cripple Creek occurs through numerous n atural <br />drainagechannelsandmanmadestructures.lnutilizingtheRationalMethod <br />for determining storm water runoff quantities, the City of Cripple Creek was <br />divided into 19 drainage basins and 99 subbasins. Design points were <br />established at specific points of interest to detennine accumulated peak flow <br />for the hydraulic analysis of existing structures and preliminary design of <br />propo>cd ~tructures. E>;hihit 1, "Drainage Map", olltlilles the subbasins and <br />indicates design point locations. Peak flow data at each design point for each <br />storm event (IQ-.year, lOO-year) is presented in Appendix B, Table 3, <br />"Hydrology: Pony Gulch. Future Development," and Table 4, "Hydrology: <br />Cripple Creek - Future Development: <br /> <br />A schematic flow diagram of the Pony Gldch and Cripple Creek watersheds <br />depicting basins, subbasins, design points, and existing structures is shown as <br />FiKure 3 in Appendix A, "Subbasin Schematic." Basic information relating to <br />cach subbasin, including drainage area, runoff coefficients, and time of <br />concentration. is provided in Tables 3 and 4 of Appendix B. <br /> <br />IV-12 <br />