Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Cross section data were obtained photogrammetrically by digitizing <br />sections of the stream and floodplain. These sections were taken from <br />the same photography flown for the topographic mapping used in this <br />study (Reference 2). The digitized sections were supplemented with <br />cross secti ons taken from thi s mappi ng as needed. All bri dge and <br />culvert data were obtained from actual field measurements. <br /> <br />TABLE IV <br /> <br />2-HOUR DESIGN STORMS <br />TODD CREEK BASIN, COLORADO <br />AREALLY ADJUSTED FOR 5-10 SQUARE MILES <br /> <br />Overbank: <br />Channel: <br /> <br />.04 to .06 <br />.04 to .06 <br /> <br /> Rai nfa 11 (inches) <br />(min) <br />Time lO-year 50-year 100-year <br />5 .03 .03 .03 <br />10 .06 .08 .08 <br />15 .13 .11 .12 <br />20 .23 .18 .21 <br />25 .38 .33 .36 <br />30 .18 .54 .64 <br />35 .09 .26 .36 <br />40 .07 .18 .21 <br />45 .06 .11 .16 <br />50 .05 .11 .13 <br />55 .05 .07 .11 <br />60 .05 .07 .11 <br />65 .05 .07 .11 <br />70 .05 .05 .05 <br />75 .05 .05 .05 <br />80 .04 .04 .03 <br />85 .03 .04 .03 <br />90 .03 .03 .03 <br />95 .03 .03 .03 <br />100 .03 .03 .03 <br />105 .03 .03 .03 <br />110 .03 .03 .03 <br />115 .03 .03 .03 <br />120 .02 .03 .03 <br />TOTALS 1.80- 2.53- 3.00- <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's "n") for the channel and overbank <br />areas were estimated by field inspection of the study area and <br />procedures outlined by Chow (Reference 1). Typical ranges for these <br />values are as follows: <br /> <br />In some areas, the higher On" values were used to account for <br />obstructions, such as trees, within the floodplain. In other areas, <br />the effective flow limits were accounted for by uSing encroachment <br />options with the HEC-2 model. <br /> <br />At certain locations, such as dam embankments, flood flows diverge <br />from the main flow path of the stream and become hydraulically <br />disconnected from the flows in the channel. These areas are <br />identified on the floodplain mapping. The extent of such flooding was <br />determined by estimating the hydraulic properties of the conveyance <br />area. A description of the flooded areas and hydraulic assumptions is <br />detailed later in this report. The computed flood profile and limits <br />of the 100-year floodplain are shown on the Flood Hazard Area <br />Delineation Plan and Profile Drawings. Tabulated data regarding cross <br />sections, stationing, flood elevations, and other pertinent hydraulic <br />information are found in Table V. Specific information regarding the <br />hydraulic calculations is available from the Urban Drainage and Flood <br />Control District. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />