|
<br />Tile nine '-eaches chosen for ccnefit:cost ev~h,dtions 011 this 5bdy were ,-elected by
<br />
<br />the Technica 1 Cooijpi t~ee, The nine reache5 '1lere de,cribed in the section "Flooded
<br />
<br />Alterndtiv('#2 @:j"!l_efit.s Costs BJC Ratio I~l't Gene fit s
<br />.--- - -------- -----.---~~-
<br />Reach 7 - ~IA- 499,000* -NA- -N^~
<br /> 8 2,742,000 1 ,541 ,~OO 1.78 1,201,000
<br /> 9 -NA- -rIA- -IM- -r;r\-
<br />
<br />.;reas" in this report.
<br />
<br />The project b('ll~fi ts Qr the r-edud i Oll in fl oad d~r:I<l~es dS~OC i <lted e itl! edch re<lch
<br />
<br />could be r-eudily identifiedund, therefore, .,re p,'('s€nted sepdrdtely.
<br />
<br />liote: SIC Ratio calc~lated using b€nefits for the 100-YNr detdined flow and costs
<br />
<br />R€su1ts
<br />-~---~-
<br />
<br />for the 100-yearundetained f1Cl\1.
<br />. Costs of 499,000 are attributed to ir:lprovedcanal crossingsa1o ngwithchannel
<br />
<br />The benefit ;cost information determined thr{lug~ this study is presented in Table 13.
<br />
<br />improvements in this area. Benefits from these irr.pr{lvementsare difficult to
<br />
<br />deterrnine and were not identified in this study.
<br />
<br />A1ternati'.e n
<br />
<br />Benefits
<br />
<br />Costs
<br />
<br />B/CRatio
<br />~,~
<br />
<br />~et Benefits
<br />---~---
<br />
<br />A1 t..rn~tiv.. " H'>n..fit<; (osts BiC Ratio Net Benefits
<br /> -
<br />Reach 1 23,000 209,300 ," Negative
<br /> 1 i,163,660 410,000 2.84 753,660
<br /> 3 78,500 303,900 ,26 ~e9~t ive
<br /> 4 443,000 1,760,700 ,25 Negative
<br /> 5 4'W,?OO 280,900 1.5/ 15~,Wll
<br /> , 175,300 424,700 ,41 ~eqdt ive
<br /> 1 -rl~- 254,300. _N_~_ _N~._
<br /> e 2,742,000 1,247,600 2.20 1,494,500
<br /> 9 -NA- -NA- -NA- -NA-
<br />
<br />Table]3
<br />
<br />Rp,lCh 1
<br /> 2
<br /> 3
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> 7
<br /> 3
<br /> 9
<br />
<br />(F~OOOPLA[~ MANAG[MENT)
<br />
<br />~:ote; BIC Rdtio l'dlcu1ated usirq bem'fil5 for tlw 100-yedr detdined flow ;md (ests
<br />for the 1 O()-ycdr det~ ineJ flu\;.
<br />
<br />Altern.ltiver? Rf'nefH< rnst,S 3ft KMir> NI't 111'T1pf i t. ~
<br />--.--._-----
<br />Redch 1 23,800 3()O,500 ,08 Ne<ptive
<br /> 2 1,163,650 837,500 1.3E 306,160
<br /> 3 73,500 668,500 .12 rie~u'.: 1 ve
<br /> , 4'13,000 "i./1l6,QUL' ,lt N'cnative
<br /> ~ 440,iOO 152,UOO ."'J ~:e9J l i V~
<br /> b 175,300 582,500 ,30 '11'giltivl'
<br /> , 57 ,
<br />
<br />. Costs Of 254,3i)() drf' attrit>uteJ to improved can~ 1 cro,sings along ~'i th channel
<br />
<br />improvements in this area. Benefits from these improverrents dre diffiwlt to
<br />
<br />d<'ter"in"d"d'lCrenot identified Inthis,tudy.
<br />
<br />Al:,'rnativ~ g lll'nefits Costs _~jIJl.a_~Lo. r.~~n~,_
<br />.~-~--- --------. ------
<br />Rl'~c~ i3,HOO 227,500 ,10 Negative
<br />2 1,163,6..10 743,000 L% 415,6QO
<br />3 !'d,!JOO ~b< ,500 ,14 Negatlve
<br />4 443,000 2,264,OfJO ,20 liega t i ~e
<br /> , 53 ,
<br />
|