Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UDFCD (Reference 53). The boundary <br />portions of Hidden Lake Drainageway was <br />for that drainage system (Reference 46). <br /> <br />of the lOO-year flood for <br />taken from the UDFCD study <br /> <br />4.2 Floodways <br /> <br />Encroachment on floodplains, such as structures and fill, reduces <br />flood-carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, <br />and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment <br />itself. One aspect of floodplain management involves balancing the <br />economic gain from floodplain development against the resulting <br />increase in flood hazard. For purposes of the NFIP, a floodway is <br />used as a tool to assist local communities in this aspect of <br />floodplain management. Under this concept, the area of the lOO- <br />year floodplain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. <br />The floodway is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent <br />floodplain areas, that must be kept free of encroachment so that <br />the lOO-year flood can be carried without substantial increases in <br />flood heights. Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to <br />l.O foot, provided that hazardous velocities are not produced. The <br />floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum <br />standards that can be adopted directly or that can be used as a <br />basis for additional floodway studies. <br /> <br />The City of Brighton, the City of Thornton, and Adams County have <br />ordinances which limit the increase in flood heights to 0.5 foot <br />above the pre-floodway elevation; therefore, floodways having no <br />more than a 0.5-foot surcharge have been delineated for these <br />communities. <br /> <br />Floodways were not computed along <br />through the City of Federal Heights <br />the scope of this study. <br /> <br />Tributary M of Niver <br />because they were not <br /> <br />Creek <br />within <br /> <br />The lOO-year floodflows on Brantner Gulch are basically confined to <br />the channel; therefore, the floodway corresponds to the lOO-year <br />flood boundary. <br /> <br />The floodways presented in this study were computed for certain <br />stream segments on the basis of equal conveyance reduction from <br />each side of the floodplain. Floodway widths were computed at cross <br />sections. Between cross sections, the floodway boundaries were <br />interpolated. The results of the floodway computations are <br />tabulated for selected cross sections (Table 3). In cases where <br />the floodway and lOO-year floodplain boundaries are either close <br />together or collinear, only the floodway boundary is shown. <br /> <br />The area between the floodway and lOO-year floodplain boundaries is <br />termed the floodway fringe. The floodway fringe encompasses the <br />portion of the floodplain that could be completely obstructed <br />without increasing the water-surface elevation of the lOO-year <br />flood more than 1.0 foot at any point. Typical relationships <br />between the floodway and the floodway fringe and their significance <br />to floodplain development are shown in Figure 17. <br /> <br />34 <br />