My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09224
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:27 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:09:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Steep Channel Water Surface Profiles
Date
7/1/1971
Prepared By
CSU
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />18 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />electronic computer. A brief review of the more salient points of some <br /> <br />of the computer oriented solutions currently in use for solution of <br /> <br />water surface profile problems follows. At least three United States <br /> <br />Governmental agencies have developed computer programs to fit their <br /> <br />particular needs. In addition, at least two other programs developed <br /> <br />by individuals are known to exist. <br /> <br />Governmental agencies which have developed computer methods for <br />water surface profile solution include the Geological Survey (USGS), <br />the Corps of Engineers (USCE) and the Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). <br />The USGS program incorporates the Standard Step Method. As in the <br />longhand calculation using this method, a step-wise s?lution becomes <br />impossible at critical flow. Since the method depends upon slope of <br />the water surface, and since this slope becomes theoretically infinite <br />as flow passes through critical, it becomes impossible to achieve an <br />energy balance between sections when flow is near critical. The USGS <br /> <br /> <br />Program is not equipped with any computational device to handle situa- <br /> <br /> <br />tions near the critical flow, so such situations cause the program to <br /> <br /> <br />stop. If the channel has any significant contractions or expansions, <br /> <br /> <br />the program may be prone to indicate a higher energy condition than <br /> <br /> <br />would actually prevail in the real case. In some cases, a condition near <br /> <br /> <br />critical may be indicated where it does not actually exist. This is due <br />to no provision having been made for contraction losses. However, if the <br /> <br />channel is fairly uniform and has tranquil flow at all discharges of <br /> <br /> <br />interest, the USGS program does a very good job. Data entry is fairly <br /> <br /> <br />easy--although it could be simplified--and output is concise and <br /> <br /> <br />readable. The strongest point of this program is its potential for <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.