My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09199
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:21 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:08:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles - Users Manual
Date
11/1/1976
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Statement <br />Number <br /> <br />Notes and Remarks <br /> <br />1490 <br /> <br />NH CARD USED. Manning's "n" value varied horizontally in <br />accordance with values on NH card. <br /> <br />1518 NH CARD STATIONS NOT INCREASING. The stations on the NH <br />card specifying changes in Manning's roughness must increase <br />and therefore the job has been terminated. <br /> <br />1525 <br /> <br />NH VALUES EXCEED 20. Manning's roughness coefficient speci- <br />fied on the NH card exceeded the allowable number. <br /> <br />1535 <br /> <br />Q - O. The discharge was not specified on the Jl card. <br /> <br />1537 START TRIB COMPo Since a negative section number was used, <br />the profile is to be computed on a tributary starting with <br />the water surface elevation which was computed for the same <br />section number on the main stem. <br /> <br />1553 <br /> <br />STARTING NC CARD OMITTED. <br />card were not given. The <br />very small (.00001). <br /> <br />The starting values on the NC <br />roughness values assumed were <br /> <br />1645 INT SEC ADDED BY RAISING SEC X, Y, FT AND MULTIPLYING BY Z.. <br />An intermediate cross section was calculated by the computer <br />and inserted between two cross sections specified by input <br />data. This interpolated cross section was calculated by <br />all horizontal stations, and hence the cross sectional area, <br />by Y. <br /> <br />1707 STCHL OR X, GREATER THAN Y. The station of the left bank <br />was given larger than the station of the right bank and there- <br />fore was assumed equal to the first station. <br /> <br />1807 BT CARDS EXCEED 50 PTS. Number of points describing the <br />bridge (Card BT) exceeded allowable. <br /> <br />1857 BT CARD, STA DON'T INCREASE. The roadway station on the BT <br />card should increase. Data should be corrected. <br /> <br />1860 XLCEL OF X, EXCEEDS RDEL OF Y. The low chord elevation of <br />X exceeds the corresponding value of the top of roadway Y. <br />Data should be corrected. <br /> <br />1912 GR CARDS, STATIONS CON'T INCREASE. The ground profile points <br />don't increase in horizontal station. The data should be <br />corrected. <br /> <br />2020 <br /> <br />NUMBER EL, STA, PTS EXCEED 100. The number of points used <br />to describe the ground profile for the current cross sectipn <br />exceeded the allowable. <br /> <br />Exhibit 7 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.