My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09165
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09165
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:14 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:07:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
290
County
Douglas
Community
Unincorporated Douglas County
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Douglas County, Colorado, Volume I
Date
9/30/1987
Designation Date
12/1/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Discharge magnitudes for floods analyzed in detailed study of the <br />South Platte River and Horse Creek were based on statistical <br />analyses of the previously mentioned stream gaging records, as <br />explained in,U.S. Water Resources Council Bulletin 17 <br />(Reference 15). <br /> <br />Discharge-probability relationships for the upstream and down- <br />stream study limits were developed using data from the gaging <br />stations below Cheesman Lake and at South platte" respectively. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for the streams studied <br />by detailed methods are shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />Hydrologic information for the streams studied by approximate <br />methods was obtained from various sources. Existing UDFCD reports <br />were used directly for Badger Gulch, Big Dry Creek, Cottonwood <br />Creek, Dad Clark Gulch, Happy Canyon Creek, Marcy Gulch, McMurdo <br />Gulch, and Piney Creek (References 16-21). A drainage area versus <br />discharge curve was developed using UD&FCD information for Happy <br />Canyon Creek Tributary, Jordan Road Tributary, KOA Tributary, New- <br />lin Gulch, South Newlin Gulch, and Oak Gulch. A procedure devel- <br />oped by the SCS was used for the 6400 Tributaries (Reference 22), <br />the Computer Model SWWM was used for Tributary A (Reference 23), <br />and the SCS TR-20 computer program was used to develop hydrologic <br />information for Glade Gulch and Section 34 Tributary (Reference 12). <br />Technical Manual No. 1 (Reference 13) was used for all other approx- <br />imate-study reaches. <br /> <br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding from the <br />, sources studied were carried out to provide estimates of the ele- <br />vations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />The water-surface profiles for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year <br />floods were developed using the SCS WSP-2 computer program (Refer- <br />ence 24) for plum Creek; the portions of East Plum Creek through <br />the Towns of Larkspur, Castle Rock, and Sedalia; West Plum Creek; <br />Indian Creek; Hangmans Gulch; the portion of Sellers Gulch through <br />Castle Rock; Unnamed Tributary to Sellers Gulch: Sulphur Creek; <br />Happy Canyon Creek; Newlin Gulch; Baldwin Gulch; Sulphur Gulch; <br />Tallman Gulch; Bayou Gulch; South Platte River; Horse Creek; and <br />West Creek. These profiles and elevations were compared with <br />historic floods and the flood stages then determined. <br /> <br />The water-surface profiles for 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods <br />on the portions of East plum Creek between Larkspur and Castle Rock <br />and between Castle Rock and Sedalia and the portion of Sellers Gulch <br />upstream of Castle Rock were developed using the COE HEC-2 step- <br />backwater computer program (Reference 25). <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.