Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a. Strong ground motion data, where available, should be evaluated <br />to develop acceleration-attenuation relationships. Families of <br />curves have been developed for areas of the U.S. where strong <br />motion data is available. <br /> <br />[ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />b. Isoseismal maps constructed from historical earthquake data <br />provide regional intensity attenuation data when strong motion <br />information is unavailable. These maps have been produced from <br />many of the high magnitude events in the U.S. The maps IlIJst be <br />used with concurrent consideration for the geology of the site <br />to be most effective. The maps have illustrated significant <br />differences in intensity attenuation in the U.S. between areas <br />east of the Rocky Mountains versus those west of the mountains. <br />Intensity attenuation is much slower in the area east of the <br />mountains. <br /> <br />6. Re servoir- Induced Se ismic i ty <br /> <br />Reservoir-induced seismLcLty should be considered in establishing <br />seismic loadings for high dams if the proposed reservoir contains <br />active faults within its hydraulic regime and if the regional and <br />local geology and seismic record within the reservoir's hydraulic <br />regime may be judged to indicate potential for reservoir-induced <br />seismicity. If all the faults within a reservoir are considered <br />tec tonically inac tive, the possibility of reservoir-induced <br />seismicity should not be totally ruled out. The potential should <br />still be considered to exist if the local and regional geology and <br />seismicity suggest that the area is subject to reservoir-induced <br />seismicity. The magnitude of reservoir-induced earthquakes is <br />established using the guidelines for likelihood of occurrence <br />similar to those used for the design earthquakes. <br /> <br />E. Selection of Design Earthquakes <br /> <br />When the evaluation of the earthquake factors described in section D is <br />completed, the maxilllJm design earthquake (MDE) and the operating basis <br />earthquake (OBE) are selected on the basis of an integrated evaluation <br />of the earthquake factors. The MDE is the largest earthquake used in <br />the seismic analysis of the dam and is generally equated to the <br />controlling maxilllJm credible earthquake (MCE) for the site. The OBE, <br />usually smaller than the MDE, represents the maximum level of ground <br />shaking that can be expec ted to occur at the site during the economic <br />life of the dam. It may not be possible to show that all possible <br />tec tonic features have been discovered. Based on investigations, gaps <br />of information may exist. If so, conservatism may be desirable <br />dependent upon the potential hazards associated with the dam. <br /> <br />1. Maximum Credible Earthquakes <br /> <br />The first part of the investigation for selec ting the MDE is to <br />estimate the hypothetical MCE for each potential earthquake source, <br />judged to have a significant influence on the site, from the <br />information developed in section D. The hypothetical MCE for each <br /> <br />-11- <br /> <br />.. <br />