My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09125
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:06 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:06:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Rio Blanco
Community
Rangely
Basin
Yampa/White
Title
FIS - Rangely
Date
9/28/1990
Prepared For
Rangely
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Cross sections for backwater analyses were digitized from 1982 <br />aerial photography (Reference 10). Since the cross sections for <br />the White River did not include any below-water geometry, adjusted <br />discharge values were used in the HEC-2 analyses for that stream. <br />The adjusted discharge values were determined by reducing the peak <br />discharges, as shown in Table 1, by the flow in the White River at <br />the time of the aerial photography. The flow in the river at the <br />time of the photography was obtained from records at the USGS <br />gaging station No. 09306300. <br /> <br />The State Highway 64 and South White Avenue bridges over the White <br />River and all culverts along College Canyon Draw and Coal Mine Draw <br />were field surveyed to obtain elevation data and structural <br />geometry. <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a floodway is computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />(Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning I s "n") were determined by field <br />observation. The coefficients used were 0.040 for the main channel <br />and 0.060 for the overbank areas on the White River, and 0.040 for <br />both the mainstream and overbank areas of Coal Mine Draw. <br />Roughness coefficients for the main channel and overbank areas of <br />College Canyon Draw varied from 0.040 to 0.045. A slope area <br />normal-depth computation was used to determine starting water- <br />surface elevations for all floods. <br /> <br />The effect of ice jams on flood hazards within Range1y were not <br />reflected in the hydraulic analyses for this study. <br /> <br />Two culverts at street crossings along College Canyon Draw limit <br />the stream carrying capacity. Limited culvert capacity at South <br />whi te Avenue causes 50-, 100-, and 500-year flows to escape the <br />channel along the right overbank. These flows result in shallow <br />flooding extending north along South White Avenue and east along <br />East Main Street. Limited culvert capacity at Prospect Street <br />causes 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year flows to escape the channel <br />along the right overbank and to flow north to the White River. <br /> <br />Normal-depth analyses were used to determine the depth of flooding <br />resulting from the overflows from College Canyon Draw. The shallow <br />LOa-year overflows occurring at South White Avenue and Prospect <br />Street were determined to have depths averaging less than 1.0 foot. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed <br />flow. The flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus <br />considered valid only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, <br />operate properly, and do not fail. <br /> <br />All elevations are referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical <br />Datum (NGVD) of 1929. Elevation reference marks used in the study <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.