My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09107
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09107
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:02 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:05:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Protecting Floodplain Resources
Date
6/1/1996
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o \Vildlands - Communities with very low-density development and much morc open <br />space already have functioning natural systems. Local officials in these areas have <br />the opportunity to safeguard floodplain functions at the outset, and to maintain valu~ <br />able habitats and superior \vater quality. <br /> <br />It may seem burdensome to plan for the protection of natural resource functions, particu- <br />larly in heavily developed areas where economic concerns and space limitations are <br />pressing issues. But every community must recognize that decisions about floodplain <br />resources are decisions about the community's future. With careful consideration and <br />planning, rivers and streams can be aesthetic and functional assets that reflect commu- <br />nity pride and ingenuity. However, a community that ignores the importance of natural <br />floodplain functions may ultimately face nood losses and deteriorating water quality. In <br />the end it would be less costly to plan "veIl now. <br /> <br />Of course. not all human activities are incompatible \vith healthy, functioning floodplain <br />ecosystems. Land uses that allow native vegetation to flourish and do not disturb soils <br />are highly suitable within the floodplain. Well-placed parks or recreational areas that <br />include vegetation are often ideal for maintaining flood storage capacity, and help to <br />support the floodplain functions that protect water quality and sustain habitats for di- <br />verse "vildlife species. Even open space areas such as agricultural lands can help to <br />maintain flood storage capacity. In addition. there are proactive measures to restore natu- <br />rally functioning floodplains, such as protecting or planting vegetated buffer strips and <br />creating channel alterations for fish habitat improvement. The following sections de- <br />scribe specific land uses and their relationship to floodplain functions: <br /> <br />Urban and Urban Fringe Areas - Development within floodplains often occurs without <br />consideration of the effects on floodplain natural resource functions. If an area is built up <br />during a period when there have been few !loads, the need for the flood storage capacity <br />of a naturally functioning floodplain may have been overlooked. The loss of natural <br />!loodplain functions in heavily developed areas not only impedes flood storage, but also <br />increases erosion and reduces the mitigating effects that vegetated areas can have on the <br />pollution of waterways. <br /> <br />Impermeable surfaces such as buildings and pavement replace vegetation as ground cover. <br />increasing the runoff that would have infiltrated in a natural floodplain. The removal of <br />vegetation. destruction of wetlands, and paving in urban and suburban settings can thus <br />increase the risk of flooding. Upstream development outside the floodplain can also <br />result in increased runoff. Vegetation loss and excessive runoff within the floodplain can <br />also cause increased erosion and sedimentation. which may cover spawning areas and <br />bury food sources in streams. Loss of vegetation also removes sources of shelter and <br />food for wildlife, and human-made structures may present barriers to migration and <br />reproductive activity. <br /> <br />The lack of naturally functioning floodplain resources in urbanized or developing areas <br />also has significance for water quality. Diffuse "nonpoint sources" sources of pollution <br />related to urbanization, such as lawn fertilizers, leached materials from waste disposal <br />areas, and chemicals leaked from automobiles, present a threat to \vater quality. Al- <br />though it is most effective to address such problems at their source, vegetative buffers <br />along waterways can help to mitigate such pollution. Urban areas also present direct <br />"point sources" of pollution to waterways, such as sewage treatment plants and indus- <br />trial discharge. Riparian vegetation would have little etlect on this type of pollution. <br /> <br />\Vetlands are particularly vulnerable to loss through human intervention. The draining <br />and filling of wetlands for development and agriculture results in the loss of an impor- <br />tant natural system for reducing runoff and maintaining the quality of surface and ground- <br /> <br />1111 <br /> <br />Figure J J - Floodplain development in the <br />United States, as well as other countries, has <br />significantly increased flood damages and <br />oftCJI degrades the floodplain en~'ironmeflt. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.