Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SEml.THREE Anected Environments and Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />the farmsteads to Sterling by approximately 2 miles. Since the travel distance would remain <br />relatively short, the increased distance does not represent a significant impact. <br /> <br />The long-term benefits associated with the proposed action include reduced potential the UPRR <br />embankment would be washed out during future flood events, and reduced damage to county <br />roads and Highway 6. Reduced flooding in Sterling would preclude the closure of several flood- <br />prone city streets. <br /> <br />3,3.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows <br /> <br />Vehicular and rail traffic would be affected by this alternative. Traffic on CR 24 would be <br />rerouted while approximately 1,100 feet ofthe road is regraded. The construction ofthe box <br />culverts under the UPRR embankment would be done by UPRR and they would be responsible <br />for rerouting train traffic while the box culverts are being installed. This alternative has been <br />designed such that flood flows would be allowed to cross Highway 6, CR 24, and CR 39. <br />During flood events, these roads would be closed to vehicular traffic. Depending on how often <br />this occurs, this alternative could have a long-term adverse effect on traffic flow. The local <br />community has stated this effect is acceptable. <br /> <br />The long-term benefits associated with the proposed action include reduced potential the UPRR <br />embankment would be washed out during future flood events, and reduced potential for damage <br />to county roads and Highway 6. Reduced flooding in Sterling would preclude the closure of <br />several flood-prone city streets. <br /> <br />3.4 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY <br /> <br />Major flooding occurred along the Pawnee Creek in 1935, 1965, 1967, 1990, 1992, and 1997 <br />(ICON 1998), which is a recurrence interval of almost once every 10 years. With high water <br />levels, sewers have backed up into homes and businesses, exposing people to raw sewage and <br />associated biological hazards. Flooded streets and roads have also contributed to increased <br />response time for emergency response vehicles. <br /> <br />3.4.1 Alternative 1 . No Action <br /> <br />With the No Action Alternative, nothing would be done to reduce flooding along Pawnee Creek <br />and flooding would continue to impact portions of Sterling and Logan County. Response times <br />of emergency vehicles would continue to be increased where closed or damaged streets, roads, <br />and highways require these vehicles to use alternate routes. <br /> <br />3,4.2 Alternative 2 . Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action) <br /> <br />With this alternative, the channel would intercept flows up to the lOO-year flood event and <br />prevent them from entering the City of Sterling and causing flood damage (ICON 2001), <br />Construction of the bridge over the channel at Highway 6 would allow the highway to remain <br />open during a 100-year flood. Response times of emergency vehicles in Sterling should not be <br />increased during future flood events. In addition, with Sterling being protected up to the <br /> <br />3-7 <br />