Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Each zone was assigned one of the following flood insurance zone <br />designations: <br /> <br />Zones A3 and AS: <br /> <br />Special Flood Hazard Areas inundated <br />by the lOa-year flood, determined by <br />detailed methods; base flood eleva- <br />tions shown, and zones subdivided <br />according to Flood Hazard Factors. <br /> <br />Zone B: <br /> <br />Areas between the Special Flood Hazard <br />Areas and the limits of the SOO-year <br />flood, including areas of the SOQ-year <br />flood plain that are protected from <br />the IOO-year flood by dike, levee, or <br />other water-control structure; areas <br />subject to certain types of IOO-year <br />shallow flooding where depths are less <br />than 1.0 foot; or, areas subject to <br />IOO-year flooding from sources with <br />drainage areas less than 1 square <br />mile. Zone B is not subdivided. <br /> <br />Zone c: <br /> <br />Areas of minimal flooding. <br /> <br />The flood elevation differences, Flood Hazard Factors, flood insur- <br />ance zones, and base flood elevations for each flooding source <br />studied in detail in the community are summarized in Table 3. <br /> <br />5.4 Flood Insurance Rate Map Description <br /> <br />The Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Lafayette is, for <br />insurance purposes, the principal result of the Flood Insurance <br />Study. This map (published separately) contains the official deline- <br />ation of flood insurance zones and base flood elevation lines. Base <br />flood elevation lines show the locations of the expected whole-foot <br />water-surface elevations of the base (lOa-year) flood. This map is <br />developed in accordance with the latest flood insurance map prepara- <br />tion guidelines published by the Federal Insurance Administration. <br /> <br />6.0 <br /> <br />OTHER STUDIES <br /> <br />The U.S. Soil Conservation Service completed a study of Coal Creek and <br />Rock Creek in October 1976 (Reference 2). Hydrologic and hydraulic <br />source material and methodology used in the U.S. Soil Conservation Service <br />study was reviewed and found to be satisfactory and acceptable. The <br />flood data generated by the u.s. Soil Conservation Service forms the <br />basis for this report. <br /> <br />13 <br />