Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />obtained above Colorado Blvd. little runoff will be discharged from the pond and, <br /> <br /> <br />therefore, the flood plain is limited to the flow in the ditch along 104th Avenue and some <br /> <br /> <br />overland flow. <br /> <br /> <br />The following are the proposed improvements in the reach: <br /> <br /> <br />(I) Raise the dam embankment at the southeast end to an elevation of 5,172 feet <br /> <br /> <br />to prevent overtopping in this area. <br /> <br /> <br />(2) A 25 foot wide concrete spillway is proposed for Brewer Reservoir with a rip- <br /> <br /> <br />rap stilling basin. <br /> <br /> <br />(3) Rip-rap is to be placed on the upstream face of the dam as part of the <br /> <br /> <br />reservoir and spillway improvements. <br /> <br /> <br />(4) An 18" CMP pipe is proposed for installation to serve as the outlet work for <br /> <br /> <br />the reservoi r. <br /> <br /> <br />(5) A 48" RCP is proposed for construction under the Colorado Agricultural Canal. <br /> <br /> <br />With the proposed improvements the flood plain will be along the main channel as is <br /> <br /> <br />shown on the drawing. <br /> <br /> <br />22. Drawing S-I (Sheet 27 of 30), Typical Channel Cross Sections <br /> <br /> <br />This drawing presents existing cross sections for the Grange Hall Creek basin. The <br /> <br /> <br />proposed improved channel cross sections, where applicable, are also shown over the <br /> <br /> <br />existing cross sections. <br /> <br /> <br />23. Drawing S-2 (Sheet 28 of 30), Typical Channel Cross Sections <br /> <br /> <br />This drawing presents the existing channel cross sections and improved sections for <br /> <br /> <br />the tributary drainage basins. <br /> <br /> <br />24. urawing S-3 (Sheet 29 of 30), Typical Cross Sections <br /> <br /> <br />This drawing presents the existing channel cross sections and improved sections for <br /> <br /> <br />the tributary drainage basins. <br /> <br />25. Drawing D-I (Sheet 30 of 30), Details <br /> <br /> <br />This drawing presents selected details for the preliminary design of the proposed <br /> <br /> <br />drainage facilities. Also shown is the recommended check drop structure design with a <br /> <br /> <br />tabulation of structure dimensions for each check drop structure indicated on the plan and <br /> <br /> <br />profi Ie drawings (Sheets 3 through 26). <br /> <br /> <br />E. James L. Carpenter Dam <br /> <br /> <br />A water supply/recreation dam and reservoir for the cities of Thornton and <br /> <br /> <br />Northglenn has been previously designed (1973) to be constructed in Grange Hall Creek <br /> <br /> <br />just upstream of Colorado Blvd. The reservoir was designed to contain 2, I 00 acre-feet of <br /> <br /> <br />storage and have a surface area of about 135 acres at a normal high water elevation of <br /> <br /> <br />5,185 feet. The dam was designed as a zoned earth embankment with a maximum height <br /> <br /> <br />of about 65 feet with a crest length of about 4,000 feet. The spillway for the structure is <br /> <br /> <br />a 135 foot wide, broad-crested weir and is located in the center of the dam. <br /> <br /> <br />The reservoir was to serve as 0 water supply source and recreational facility for the <br /> <br /> <br />cities of Thornton and Northglenn. Due to the relatively low average annual damage <br /> <br /> <br />potential for the storm flows in Grange Hall Creek the dam and spillway was not designed <br /> <br /> <br />specifically for flood control and, therefore, was not considered a part of the alternative <br /> <br /> <br />matrix to be evaluated in the Grange Hall study. In the Phase A portion of the Grange <br /> <br /> <br />Hall Major Drainageway Planning Study an evaluation of the flood control benefits of the <br /> <br /> <br />proposed Carpenter Dam was made as a necessary part of the analysis. <br /> <br /> <br />The hydraulic evaluation of the dam and reservoir in Phase A was based upon the <br /> <br /> <br />data presented in the specifications and drawings for the dam (Ref. 15). The 5-year and <br /> <br /> <br />I DO-year storm flows for the future developed basin were routed through the reservoir and <br /> <br /> <br />channel routed through to the South Platte River. The results of the reservoir routings <br /> <br /> <br />indicate a significant reduction in the flood peaks below the dam. Since the presence of <br /> <br /> <br />Carpenter Dam would have a significant effect on the peak flows below the dam and <br /> <br />21 <br />