Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br /> <br />Provide Technical Assistance to Community Leaders. Community and landowners need assistance in <br />formulating and planning their river or stream rehabilitation projects. Floodplain management must be <br />expanded to include stream rehabilitation/stabilization, habitat and riparian zone preservation/enhancement, <br />and flood hazard mitigation. Eighty eight percent of the respondents cited one more problems relating to <br />stream corridors or local flooding. This high percentage indicates a recognition that flooding is a natural <br />function of this portion of the watershed. However, this function is in direct conflict with historic practices <br />of man's decision to place certain types of structures in this portion of the watershed. <br /> <br />Fundine Imolementation Needs. Most communities desire local level funding for their projects. However, <br />communities and counties identified that local funds are unavailable or insufficient to support stream <br />corridor projects. Thirty six percent of the respondents indicated lack of funding was the primary obstacle <br />to planning and implementing improvements. Economic factors have affected many communities due to <br />the rapid influx of new residents who want daily life sustaining needs to be provided including water <br />supplies, water treattnent, streets, other utilities. These demands frequently consume all the fiscal and staff <br />resources of communities. As a result, floodplain and stream corridor planning and management is pushed <br />to a lower priority until natural flooding occurs which leave no alternative but to deal with floodplain <br />survival rather than management. Unfortunately, when such events have passed, the need to prepare for <br />the next event is often forgotten as evidenced by seventy percent of the respondents stating they do not have <br />a funding mechanism or if they do, it is inadequate to deal with current conditions. There needs to be an <br />effective program for administration of grants for planning activities and loans for floodplain and stream <br />corridor project implementation and construction. There is also a need for fiscal resources to assist in flood <br />related emergency response and post-flood land acquisition to assist in relocating property owners from <br />the floodplain to alternate locations. <br /> <br />Public Information/Technical Assistance Needs. Community leadeh need a better understanding of the <br />basics of how stream corridors function to support decision making processes, investigations, and <br />compliance investigations. The respondents indicate an immediate need for mapping 460 miles of <br />unmapped l00-year floodplain area. This has been conservatively estimated to be approximately 1500 <br />miles statewide. As Colorado's population continues to increase, this need will also expand. Twenty <br />percent of respondents believed floodplain maps need updating. Many of the maps were originally <br />prepared in the early 1970's and contained limited or inaccurate information. Community managers and <br />stakeholders need technical information on stream rehabilitation and stabilization. With man's increased <br />pressure to utilize floodplains and steam corridors for other uses, the need to accurately predict where <br />certain levels of flow will reach becomes imperative to insure human and natural uses do not conflict. <br />Man's presence must accommodate the stream's need to also occupy portions of the floodplain, since flood <br />waters exercise a very real presence with no opportunity for negotiation. <br /> <br />VII-2 <br /> <br />97-06(LOOl <br />