FLOOD09060 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITEM SURVEY RESULTS STATEWIDE EXTRAPOLATION MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROJECTS Wetlands Management 45 communities thought there were Needs/Opportunities for needs/opportunities and 18 Development, Enhancement, organizations indicated the Preservation needs/opportunities. Needs/Opportunities for Open Space 54 communities though there were Enhancement needs/opportunities, while 19 organizations did Needs/Opportunities for Multi- Communities - 70 said yes Objective Projects 34 said no Organizations - 20 said yes I said no INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES Watershed Planning Needs 19 communities indicated a need or Master Framework Planning for update of drainage master plans. Basins See Table 5-4 for list of watersheds that need master planning or updated master planning. Need for Drainage Criteria Manual 55 communities indicated a need & Detention Policy with Uniform for a drainage criteria manual and Criteria for Flood - Critical 52 indicated there was no need. Facilities. Detention Existing Funding Mechanism 30 communities stated they an existing funding mechanism and 85 said they did not have a funding. mechanism or it was inadequate. Type of Existing Funding Mechanism See Table 5-5 for a list of different types of existing funding mechanisms for communities. Future Funding Sources The numbers below indicate how (Top Three Funding Sources many communities preferred these Preferred) funding sources 49 - Statewide Revolving Fund 24 - Storm Drainage Utilities 21 - Storm Drainage Fees Need for Statewide Storm Drainage 68 communities indicated a need Criteria Manual for a statewide storm drainage criteria manual and 35 communities did not. V-3 97~.OOl