Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The additional discharge to be added to the <br />computed flow through the breach is therefore <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />30,900 + 32,400 = 63,300 cfs. <br /> <br />The additional volume to pass through Lake <br />Catamount coming from Stagecoach reservoir was <br />estimated by subtracting the volume of the flood that <br />fills the freeboard storage space in Lake Catamount <br />plus the volume that escapes through the spillways from <br />the total volume coming from Stagecoach, or <br /> <br />v. = 33,275 <br />= 33,275 <br />= 21,376 <br /> <br />- {(18,900 - 7,422) + 421} <br />- { 11,487 + 421 } <br />acre-feet <br /> <br />Using these parameters, the dam failure hydrograph <br />at Lake Catamount was computed to, have the' following-' <br />characteristics: <br /> <br />v, <br />qp <br />tb <br /> <br />= 40,276 <br />= 127,251 <br />= 7.66" <br /> <br />acre feet <br />cfs <br />hours <br /> <br />The Yampa River downstream of Lake Catamount dam to <br />Sunbeam in unincorporated Moffat County was divided <br />into ten stream reaches. The stream reaches were shown <br />in the schematic diagrams, and the trapezoidal valley <br />cross section data used to typify each reach was shown <br />in Table 2. <br /> <br />The results of the DWR model analysis are summarized <br />in Table 3. Since the routed peak discharge at the end <br />of reach 13 was approximately equal to the estimated <br />peak discharge of the 100-year flood, the analysis was <br />not continued beyond this point. <br /> <br />23 <br />