Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />December 7,1991 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Model Calibration <br /> <br />Before the HEC-6 model could be used as a design tool for sizing the Diversion Dike, it was <br />necessary to confirm that the computed sediment yield output closely matched the report <br />average annual yield in the Plan. <br /> <br />In order to model the flood flow down the alluvial fan, a representative channel width had to be <br />estimated. It was assumed that apex flows reaching the Dike would be confined to a single <br />channel with a top width equal to that given by Dawdy /FEMA regime equation. <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />9,500.4 <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />Top width of flow (feet) <br />Discharge (CFS) <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />This equation also relies on the assumption that the flow forms the channel and the depth of <br />flow is at critical depth. <br /> <br />The major unknown variable affecting the sediment carrying capacity of the flood flows was the <br />percentage of wash load materials (silts) in the inflowing sediment. The concentration of these <br />fine particles affects the total sediment carrying capacity. The distribution of inflow particles <br />larger than wash load size was based on the distribution of grain sizes found in the fan. The <br />fraction for the silt range was selected according to the percentage of wash load material that is <br />commonly found in materials in the valley alluvium. This procedure led to a silt and sand <br />distribution of 40% and 60%, respectively. <br /> <br />The estimation of an equivalent average annual sediment yield from the HEC-6 model was done <br />using a numerical integration procedure. The HEC-6 model was run for seven single <br />discharges, each with a channel width and sediment inflow estimates as described above, over <br />the alluvial fan to produce sediment outflow rates for each. A generalized power function <br />equation was developed to relate the sediment outflow to the discharge, which was then <br />applied to the 2,5, 10,25,50 and 100-year flood hydrographs. The volume of sediment yield <br />for each of the events was computed by summing sediment flow for each time increment in the <br />hydrograph. Attachment 4 shows this procedure, <br /> <br />The average annual yield of 11.7 acre.feet matches the target rate and reflects a slightly lower <br />annual rate than the 16 AF stated in the Plan. The average annual yield estimated using this <br />procedure reflects the integration of storm events in excess of the 2-year storm. Some <br />sediment yield is expected for lesser events. A slight adjustment must also be made to account <br />for the annual series statistical analysis represented by this analysis. The adjustment factor of <br />1.3 and was computed by integrating the total individual storm volumes for the Flamingo Wash <br />at Las Vegas, NV and Las Vegas Wash at North Las Vegas, NV gages and comparing this to <br />the total annual runoff volume of those gages. Both gages resulted in comparable <br />relationships, therefore the target annual sediment yield of 16 AF was reduced by 1.30 for an <br />actual target of 12.3 AF, The 11.7 AF was determined to be within calibration accuracy (5%) of <br />the target. <br />