Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />system on the hydrology of the basin, and all were helpful in pro- <br />viding information on the operation of their canals and reservoirs. <br />Information pertinent to this study was that in most cases the <br />irrigation canals have a normal operating capacity, defined by their <br />water rights, and a greater bankful capacity. The difference between <br />the bankful and normal discharges is the capacity generally available <br />to intercept drainage flows during operation season, which coincides <br />with the cloudburst flood season. The irrigation canals most likely <br />to affect flood flows along Dry Creek are the Larimer and Weld Canal <br />(Eaton Ditch), the Larimer County Canal, Terry Inlet, the poudre <br />Valley Canal, and the North Poudre Ditch. Only the canals down- <br />stream of Douglas Reservoir, that is, the Larimer and Weld Canal, <br />the Larimer County Canal and the Terry Inlet, would contribute to <br />a reduction in peak flows in Fort Collins. <br />The approximate normal operating and bankful discharges for <br />these canals are shown in Table I. <br /> <br />TABLE I <br />Approximate Ditch Capacities <br /> <br /> Normal Bankful Flood Interception <br />Canal Capacity Capacity Capacity <br />Larimer and Weld 700 cfs 1,000 cfs 300 cfs <br />Terry Inlet 100 cfs 200 cfs 100 cfs <br />Larimer County 575 cfs 700 cfs 125 cfs <br /> <br />The Irrigation Ditch Companies also stressed that in the event <br />of flooding within the Dry Creek Basin, the canal systems would be <br />shut down so that flood flows could be intercepted and peaks reduced <br />downstream. Good information was available on the response time of <br />the ditches at Dry Creek, which would be the time required for the <br />ditch to become noncontributing. This concept will receive further <br />analysis later in the Master Drainageway Planning Study; however, a <br />flood warning system utilizing these ditches could significantly <br />reduce the potential for flooding at Fort Collins, if the integrity <br />of the system could be insured. Without a warning system, however, <br />timely and proper shutdown of these canals should not be relied upon <br />to reduce potential flooding downstream. "Canal shutdown" was not <br />considered in this analysis. <br /> <br />-4- <br />