Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />UTILE DRY CREEK FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS <br />ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO <br /> <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> <br />Master planning studies conducted in 1974 and 1981 estimated that the City of Englewood would <br />suffer approximately $14 million in damages from a 100-year flood along Little Dry Creek. The <br />extensive floodplain (Figure 1) was also a severe constraint for the City's plans for redevelopment and <br />revitalization of the central downtown area. McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd. was retained to design <br />flood control improvements along Little Dry Creek through the City of Englewood. In the course of <br />the 8-year effort of design and construction a number of challenging constraints and problems were <br />overcome by unique solutions. <br /> <br />Downtown Conduit Improvements <br />A major constraint in the downtown area was the existence of a box culvert 3,500 feet long with poor <br />entrance conditions and a twisting alignment with numerous sharp bends. Hydraulic calculations <br />indicated that flow conditions within the conduit were extremely unstable, fluctuating between <br />subcritical and supercritical regimes. At bends in the conduit, supercritical shock waves striking the <br />ceiling created pressure flow conditions upstream that threatened to reduce the capacity of the <br />conduit To confirm the hydraulic calculations and proposed designs for an extension of the conduit <br />and an improved inlet structure, a model of the conduit was constructed at the Engineering Research <br />Center at Colorado State University in Fort Collins. Colorado. Tests conducted with the model <br />verified the hydraulic calculations and enabled refmement of the designs for conduit improvements <br />to optimize its capacity, <br /> <br />Conduit improvements were constructed in two phases. During the winter of 1985 a 400 foot long <br />segment of 12 feet high by 24 feet wide reinforced concrete conduit was completed at a cost of <br />$725,000. In the summer of 1987 a 630 foot extension of the box was completed within 60 days at a <br />cost of $600,000 under a fast track schedule to meet surrounding development plans, <br /> <br />OfT-Channel Storage Facility <br />Comparison of the 3,650 cfs capacity of the improved conduit with the 4,400 cfs 100-year flow entering <br />Englewood upstream confirmed the need for a storage facility that would reduce the peak flow to a <br />magnitude within the capacity of the box culvert, A storage facility located at the upstream end of the <br />project would also economize the sizing of channel and bridge improvements along the 0.7 mile reach <br />downstream to the downtown conduit entrance, <br />