Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY: <br />Montrose, Delta and Mesa Counties, Colorado <br /> <br />In Region II snowmelt also creates the highest and most sustained <br />flows. On the San Miguel River at Naturita, Colorado, the highest <br />recorded flow (7,100 cfs) occurred on April 15, 1942 and must have <br />been primarily snowmelt. For smaller drainage areas, thunderstorms <br />cause the most severe flooding. <br /> <br />4. Hydrology - The flood histories of Regions I and II indicate <br />that a synthetic storm hydrograph, predicting streamflow based on <br />rainfall alone, is not adequate. For these regions a flood-flow <br />frequency analysis based on peak separation of the mixed population <br />of snowmelt and rainfall runoff was used to calculate frequency <br />curves for the study areas. Because the data available for small <br />drainage basins in Region II is so limited, the Rational Method was <br />used to find flows for Tributary I to the San Miguel River at <br />Naturita which has a very small watershed (1.3 square miles). <br /> <br />For the flood-flow-frequency analysis of mixed flow populations it <br />is necessary to separate the peak flow caused by each of the events; <br />in this case, the rainfall and snowmelt runoff. When peak flows for <br />each event are found, flood-flow-frequency analysis is performed on <br />the two sets of data. The resulting curves are combined statis- <br />tically to give the maximum flow from both events. The procedures <br />of combining rainfall and snowmelt frequency curves are described <br />as follows: <br /> <br />(1) select a peak discharge <br /> <br />(2) read the probabilities for rainfall and snowmelt events <br />from the respective frequency curve at the selected peak <br />discharge <br /> <br />(3) combine probabilities by the following equation: <br /> <br /> pet) = per) + pes) (p( r) x pes)) <br />Where pet) = total probability of the selected peak discharge <br /> per) = probability of the rain flood event at the selected <br /> peak discharge <br /> <br />pes) = probability of the snowmelt flood event at the <br />selected peak discharge. <br /> <br />A definite methodology to isolate the quantity of rainfall runoff <br />from its snowmelt (or other) base has not been established. <br />Discussion continues as to whether the base flow should or should <br />not be subtracted from the total flow occurring during or after a <br />rainstorm. In a particular region equal rainflood peaks occurring <br />at different times of the summer will indicate different amounts of <br />rainfall runoff, depending on the amount of the snowmelt base. <br />Theoretically, then the snowmelt base should be subtracted out to <br /> <br />-4- <br />