Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Since the hydrograph shown in Figure 3 is the result of a storm <br />distributed over the entire Dry Creek basin, the storm intensity <br />used in the analysis is not so great as that used for a localized <br />storm event that could occur over the lower basin. Therefore, the <br />secondary peak from local runoff in Figure 3 may be less than the <br />actual IOO-year peak for the basin below the Larimer-Weld Canal. <br /> <br />HYDRAULICS <br /> <br />Procedure <br /> <br />A thunderstorm was modeled for this lower basin <br />and lO-year flood peaks from localized runoff. <br />analysis are shown in Table V. <br /> <br />to verify the 100-year <br />The results of this <br /> <br />A hydraulic analysis was completed along the 6.s-mile study reach to <br />determine water surface profiles for the 10-year, 50-year, 100-year <br />and 50 a-year flood events. These water surface elevations were computed <br />using the HEe-II computer model for backwater analysis (Reference S). <br />Water surface profiles for the 10-year, 50-year, lOa-year and SOO-year <br />events are presented on Sheets P-l through P-S. The lO-year, 50-year, <br />lOO-year and SOO-year frequency wa'ter surface elevation nt each of the cross <br />sections is tabulated in Table VI. <br /> <br />Table V <br /> <br />Alta Vista <br /> <br />650 <br /> <br />520 <br />160 <br /> <br />Cross sections used in this study were developed using topographic <br />mapping with a two-foot contour interval. At crossing structures <br />and in other areas critical to the hydraulic analysis, cross sections <br />were supplemented with field survey information. The geometry of all <br />crossing structures was measured in the field, and photographs or <br />sketches of each structure are included in the Technical Addendum to <br />this report (Reference 7). <br /> <br />FREQUENCY DISCHARGES <br />(WITH CHANNEL DIVERSION) <br /> <br />lOa-Year <br />Location Discharge (cfs) <br /> <br />10-Ye;:u: <br />DisCharqe (cfs) <br /> <br />Confluence with poudre River 1,400 <br /> <br />~lannings' roughness coefficients ("n" values) were determined through <br />field inspection. A photographic sUIr.mary, by reaches, of the Dry <br />Creek flood plain was prepared, and the "n" values used for ch",nncl <br />and overbank areas were presented to the Technical Committee for <br />review prior to completion of the hydraulic analysis. The summary <br />of roughness coefficients is included in the Technical Addendum to <br />this report (Reference 7). ~lannings "n" values varied greatly throughout <br />the study reach. Ranges of "n" villucs used in this study were the <br />following: <br /> <br />^ more thorough description of the hydrology prepilred for this report <br />is presented in the TeChnical Addendum (Reference 7). <br /> <br />Channel S",,,tiol\s <br /> <br />.03 to .05 <br /> <br />Ovcrbanlc Areas <br /> <br />.015 to .10 <br /> <br />-16- <br /> <br />-17 - <br />