My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08898
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:07:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:58:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Golden, Lakewood
Stream Name
Lena Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Lena Gulch Master Drainage Plan Volume 1
Date
6/1/1975
Prepared For
Golden, Lakewood, Wheatridge
Prepared By
UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SECTION III <br /> <br />HYDROLOGICAL SUMMARY <br /> <br />GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> <br />The extent of present flooding and the slzlng and character of major <br />drainage works and other urban storm dral:n..ge facilities are deter- <br />mined by the magn I tude of runoff. Fu rthe rmon~, the des I gn of the <br />facilIties must be based upon expected sediment pt"Oblems, In<:ludl ng <br />both degradation and aggradation, and water quality problems. <br /> <br />Any master plan must be based on adequate and thorough hydrological <br />studies If the plan Is to have a slgnlfl<:ant value and establIsh a <br />firm factual basIs. HydrologIcal studIes must take Into considera- <br />tion volume of runoff, as well as peak rates of flow. I t Is when <br />the volume characterIstIcs are known that one realIzes the value of <br />detention storage, both pond type and channel storage, t,) reduce the <br />peak rates of flow. <br /> <br />The magnItude of a flood can be Judged by Its maxImum rate of flow, <br />even though the max Imum rate may I as t for on 1 y ten mInutes. The fre" <br />quency of a flood Is Judged by Its n~turn pedod. The return period <br />Is defined as the average Interval of time withIn whIch a given .,vent <br />will be equalled or exceeded once. Thus, a f'lood havIng a r.,turn peri- <br />od of 100 years has a one per oent probabl'll ty of beIng (~qualled or "x- <br />ceeded In any given year. <br /> <br />Runoff flows were determined at many 10cat10n5 for' return periods of <br />10, 25 and 100 years so that a determination could be made concern.. <br />Ing the storm frequency for which drainage facilltl"s sh()uld be <br />desIgned. The deta11ed Information ,)1' the computlltTonal methods <br />are presented In appendIx form, wIth thi" section hign1ighting basic <br />i nformat i on. <br /> <br />The approach taken by the DRCOG U rbat, Stann D ra I nllge C rIte rl CI Manual <br />In the determinatIon of runoff flows Is: <br /> <br />1. DetermInation of rainfall that \.ould most 11k.dy occur durlns an <br />event with a given return perIod. ThIs Is done at present by US" <br />of Isohyetal (line of equal dept~ rainfall) Depth-Duratlon- <br />Frequency maps that were synthesized during the formation of the <br />Manual. ThIs provides a basIc Input for the r'unoff computation. <br />This Information was analyzed foIC the. Lellll Gulch 'watershed in sev- <br />eral locatIons and found to be r<.latlvely constant. This Is some- <br />what unusual as rainfall varies .::onslderably across the Denv,"r <br />region, but remains more constan:: her'" because the wlltershed 1s <br />In a flat saddle portion of the 1sohyetal map. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.