Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />41. Extent amd character offlooded area-Orops.-The principal crops <br />in order ef thair importance in the overflow area are sugar beets, <br />alfalfa, cern, beans, small grains, truck garden, and hay. The aver- <br />age total annual ,value of the main crops, based upon present condi- <br />tions; is $48,300 Or $46 per acre for 1,050 acres, The distribution, <br />average annual yield a,nd value, and total value for the most impor- <br />tant crops). whon not damaged by flood, are shown in table No, 5, <br />appendi", U.' " <br />42. Extent and character of flooded area-Property values.-The <br />value of all public, industrial, business, railroad, and utility proper, <br />ties was determined from information furnished by officials of the po- <br />litical subdivisions concerned, and by owning corporations or parties. <br />The value of lands and other improvements was determined by field <br />appraisals. The estimated total value of p<roperty in the flood plain <br />is $5,673,500. The value of railroad property in the flood plain <br />amounts to $3,450,500, in TJ:inidad, and $278,300 outside ofTrin- <br />idad, which is about 65 pcrcent of the total valuation in the overfloW <br />area. The total property in the city of Trinidad flood plain, exclud- <br />ing railroad and irrigation, amounts to $1,520,700. The agricultural- <br />land values in the Hood plain are $118,300. Irrigation headworks, <br />prior to the Hood of April 1942, were valued at $166,500. The classi- <br />fication and estimated value of property in the flood plain are sbown <br />in table No. '6, appendix C.' ' <br />43. Flood damages-General.-Flood damages have been classified <br />as tangible and inta,ngible. Tangible flood damages have been com- <br />piled as direct and indirect losses. A distinction has been made be- <br />tween 'prevcntable llJid nonpreventable, also between recurrent and <br />nonrecurrent damages. At the time the inventory of property in the <br />floed plain wasnlade, estimates were also ma,de of the damages that <br />would be sllst,ained by each unit of property in Trinidad in the event <br />of the recurrence of Hoods reaching the elevation of those of Sep- , <br />tember 30, 1904, and of July 22 1925, and in the event of the occur- <br />rence of a flood reaching an elevation .5 feet higher thllJl that of 1904, <br />which would have an estimated maximum discharge of 112,000 cubic <br />feet per second. Immediately following the flood of April 1942, a <br />survey of dltmages from Sopris Dam site to the mouth of Purgatoire <br />River WitS made, , . <br />44. Flood damage,,- Trinidad.- The greatest losses from Hood- <br />waters havc occurrcd at Trinidad and the tangible losses Itt that city <br />have consistcd principally of damages to residential, business, indus- <br />trial, municipal, and public-utility properties. An account of the <br />1904 flood, the most disastrous known at Trinidad, published in the <br />United States Geological Survey Water Supply llJld Irrigation Paper <br />No~ 147, gives the estimated losses in the city as $3.50,000. Local <br />interests have ostimated the losses in the city from this flood at <br />$500,000. The flood reached an estimated peak discharge of 45,'000 <br />cubic feet per 'secollfl. During this flood communication, transporta- <br />tion, a,nd publie utility installations were severely damaged and <br />services were interrupted. Several brick and stone structures adja, <br />ccnt to the river were destroyed, and foul' bridges in the city were <br />swept entirely aWltY. ' " . <br />45. The flood of April 1942, the second largest of record, produced <br />a peak discharge 'about 9,000 cubic feet per second less thltn the 1904 <br /> <br />I,Not printed. <br />