Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FLJTUREFLOOD5 <br /> <br />This section of the ropo.t disc~esos the Standard <br />Projsct flood and the Intermediate Regionel Flood on_"IoJlu"'ont <br />Creek in the vi~inity of Colorsdo Springs, and some of the hazards <br />of gre-at floods. Thll5tandarctProject Flood represents the reason_ <br />"bhuppllr limits of expected flooding. Floods of Intermediate <br />Regio~sl Flood size ~~y be exp8cted to occur ~ore often, but they <br />will ~ot be as severe as the infrequent Standard Proje~t Flood. <br />L~rge floods havo o~c~rrod in the psst on Monu~ent <br />Creek and cthar tributsries of Fount~in Creek in the general geo- <br />graphical and physiographical region of Colorado Springs. SBv~re <br />stO~5, similer to those causing past floods, undoubtedly will <br />r~CUr in t~e M~nument Creek watershed to ~~use future flQods of <br />ecual or gruater aiLe. In ~ny dotarmination of futuro floodc <br />,"ht~~ m~y n~",," nn ~ given stre"m, it is de~iretlle to ccnsider <br />811 ~to~mo Dnd flood~ thct h"vo OC~LJr~ed in the region 0<' "..tar- <br />~hed~ ~ith similar topography, wat~r~ha~ ~aver, ~nd pnyslc~l <br />cnari;cteristics. <br /> <br />Intermediate Regional flood magnitude, ~nd its peak discharge <br />approached that of the Standard Projeot Flood._50,OOO versus 63,400 <br />cubi~ feet per s~cond. <br />The maxi~um known floods that ~~ve occurred ~ithin th~ <br />geographical region ~re lIsted in Table 4. flood characteriatics <br />of the Intermediah Regional flood for avaragetJ '''a~i",um C{Jndition~ <br />within the study raacheg are gho~~ in Teble 5. <br /> <br />Inta~ro~i3tG R~4ional flood <br /> <br />Stanaard Proiect flood <br />Only in rare inotances han a ~pc~ific otre~rn experienced <br />tne largB9t flOOd that is potonti"lly possible. Severu ~6 th~ '''a~l- <br />~urn known flood may havB been on any given 8tream, it i~ g~ner~lly <br />~~cepted thet ~ l~rger flood ~ill sooner or later occur. The Stan_ <br />dard Project flood is defined a8 the flood that CaJl be expacted <br />from the most severe co~binetioJl of meteorological and hydrologi~~l <br />~onditlons that is consider~d reasonatlly characteristic of the <br />geographical llrea in which the drainage basin is loc~ted, excluding <br />extremely rare combinations. The Corps of Engin~ers, in cooper~tion <br />with the NOAA Wellther Servic", I,.", made cornpr"hensiv" ~tudies lInd <br />investigations bes~d on tho vest records of expe~i~nc8d storm~ ~nd <br /> <br />The Intermediate R8gion~1 Flood is defined ae having <br />'HI "v~L'a\is fr(l'lUBncy of OCGurr~nc~ cf once in 100 years, ~t " <br />deeignet~ location, although it may occ~r in any ye~r and po,- <br />sibly even in ~ucC8ssive yoars. Th~ Intermediate Regional Flood <br />rep.sssnta 8 major flood, ~lthough it io 1~88 sever~ th~n the <br />St3n~ard Project flood. <br />Tho m~Qnitude of this flood on th~ fllonulOsnt Creek <br />study reachwes deterrnined frOOlstatistical analysis of rngicn"l <br />~nn".,l re~~ fln" rAr.ords. Also, the vari"bl" rainfall and runorf <br />char"cteristics of she","s in tlw '.lunar"l ragion were compared, <br />adjo~ted ~hen nGceeoary, and u3ed for the ~naiysi5. The M~y 193~ <br />f!Dod on Monument Crpek at Colorado Springs ~~s larger then <br /> <br />flouJ~ ",,,J 1,,,~ "v"lv;-,d 9~r>~~"1l",,,,d p1;ucedur.." for cct1",,,t1~,.. t~~ <br /> <br />flood potential of waterwayu. flood ch~racteri$tics of the St~ndard <br />Project Flood fo~ aver~ged maximum conditions within th~ study rea~he3 <br />"re shown in Table 5. <br /> <br />Freouuncy <br /> <br />By definition, the IJlter~ediat" RGgion~l flood has ~n <br />~v~rage oc~urrence freque~cy of onc~ in 100 years. It is imprac- <br />ticel, however, to aS$ign ~ frequen~y to the greeter Standard <br />Proje~t floOd. For purposes of hazard ovaluation, it is impcrtant <br />to recognize that eithor of the3e ~ejor floods c~n oc~ur ~n sny <br />year. floods larger than the Standsrd I!roj~d Flood ere pogeible, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />