Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.r <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The U.S. Geological Survey published an open-file report (84-137) of stream statistics <br />that shows a stream gaging station on Surface Creek at Cedaredge with 64 years of data, <br />The station (number 01943500) is listed as having a basin area of 39.5 square miles, <br />mean basin elevation of 9930 feet and mean annual precipitation of 30A-inches, Land <br />use for this basin is shown at 59-percent forest, 14-percent agricultural, 26-percent range <br />and I-percent urban use. The study area is above this gage but very little tributary area <br />contributes to stream flows through the study area due to the topographic conditions. <br /> <br />5.0 100-YEAR FLOOD FLOW <br /> <br />The 100-year flood flow given in the USGS Report for the gaging station on Surface <br />Creek at Cedaredge is 1140-cfs based on 64 years of stream data. This number is <br />consistent with flows used in the 1983 study and is used for the purpose of this study, No <br />hydrologic analysis was performed. As measured stream gage data was used for <br />establishment ofthe 100-year flow, no adjustments are required to account for irrigation <br />diversions. <br /> <br />6.0 METHOD <br /> <br />The hydraulic analysis utilized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 model to <br />determine water surface profile and flow characteristics. A field survey was used to <br />determine geometric conditions for the creek, overbanks and bridges for input to the <br />HEC-2 model. Roughness factors (Manning's "n" values) were determined based on <br />visual observation and were estimated at 020 for overbanks and 0,045 for the channel. <br /> <br />The flow regime for this section of the creek is supercritical and the model was run from <br />upstream to downstream to calculate supercritical water surface elevations. The slope <br />area method was used to determine starting water surface elevation at the upstream cross- <br />section. The model interpolated cross-sections between measured cross-sections where <br />necessary due to changes in channel conditions, Bridges were modeled several different <br />ways with no significant impact to calculated water surface elevation (CWSE). <br />Manning's "n" for overbanks was increased to OA5 to check sensitivity and no significant <br />change to CWSE was noted, The model was also checked using flow records and <br />measured water surface elevations for the date of survey. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analysis was made based on unobstructed flow. Visual observations of <br />high water marks at bridges were used to correlate results with field data. All elevations <br />are referenced to the NGVD Datum 1929. <br /> <br />The HEC-2 model results are attached to this report along with stream profiles and <br />associated mapping. A summary of results in given in Table 1. <br /> <br />2 <br />