Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Cross section data for streams in the study area were obtained from <br /> w-w r sections were <br />0 ained by field Dlt::a:;,uI.t::wt::uL. All I>. idges and cu1.erts were <br />measured to obtain elevation data and structural geometry. <br /> <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a f100dway is computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shown on the Flood Boundary and F100dway <br />Map (Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's "n") were estimated by field <br />inspection at each cross section and checked for reasonableness <br />against a standard text (Reference 6). Roughness values for the <br />main channel ranged from 0.034 to 0.070 on the Animas River, from <br />0.025 to 0.045 on Junction Creek, and from 0.024 to 0.040 on Dry <br />Gulch Creek. Roughness values for the floodplain ranged from 0.060 <br />to 0.080 on the Animas River, and from 0.030 to 0.050 on Junction <br />Creek; a value of 0.050 was used on Dry Gulch Creek. <br /> <br />Water-surface profiles <br />developed using the <br />(Reference 7). <br /> <br />of the selected recurrence <br />COE HEC-2 step-backwater <br /> <br />intervals were <br />computer model <br /> <br />Flood profiles were drawn showing computed water-surface elevations <br />to an accuracy of 0.5 foot for floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals. <br /> <br />The flood profiles presented in this study are based on <br />of flow through unobstructed hydraulic structures and <br />considered valid only if these structures do not fail <br />unobstructed. Hydraulic analyses were conducted by <br />(Reference 3) and reviewed by the study contractor. <br /> <br />the effects <br />are, thus, <br />and remain <br />the COE <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for the reach of the Animas River from MP <br />63.000"to--MP-"63.251were-eon<lueted- by" "Goff-"E"g~neering "& -Surveying, <br />Inc. (Reference 1) and reviewed by the study contractor. <br /> <br />All elevations are referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical <br />Datum of 1929 (NGVD). Elevation reference marks used in this study <br />are shown on the maps; the description of the marks are presented in <br />Elevation Reference Marks (Exhibit 3). <br /> <br />4".0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS <br /> <br />The NFIP encourages State and local governments to adopt sound floodplain <br />management programs. Therefore, each Flood Insurance Study provides 100- <br />year flood elevations and delineations of the 100- and 500-year <br />floodplain boundaries and 100-year f100dway to assist communities in <br />developing floodplain management measures. <br /> <br />8 <br />