My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08739
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08739
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:15:25 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:49:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Determination of Roughness Coefficients for Streams in Colorado
Date
1/1/1985
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The relation of stream power and median grain size to the type of regime <br />flow (modified from Benson and Dalrymple, 1967) is shown in figure 5. If the <br />value 62RS V plots above the upper line, it may be assumed the upper-regime <br />w <br />flow occurs. <br /> <br />If the stream power plots below the upper-regime line, a reliable n value <br />cannot be assigned. Methods for evaluating depth-discharge relations for the <br />lower- and transition-regime flows, which are beyond the scope of this report, <br />are discussed in Simons and Senturk (1977). <br /> <br />Stable Channels <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />!. <br /> <br />The base n values for a stable channel normally range from about 0.025 <br />for firm earth to about 0.070 or larger for large-boulder channels and shallow <br />depths as shown in table 2. These values are based on verification studies; <br />however, the values have a wide range because the effects of bed roughness are <br />difficult to separate from the effects of other roughness factors. The rough- <br />ness of a reach in exposed bedrock can be evaluated in terms of the average <br />height of rock protrusions above the bedrock surface and by using this value <br />as an indicator of median diameter in table 2. Large boulders scattered in a <br />stream need to be considered as channel obstructions. Personal experience and <br />judgment will influence the selection of the base n value. <br /> <br />Analysis of available verified stream n value data indicates n values <br />vary with depth of flow (see section "Depth of Flow"). This is true for many <br />streams in Colorado. Prediction equations have been developed to assess the <br />base channel roughness to assist in the determination of n values from onsite <br />inspection or from photographs. Two equations are presented, one by Limerinos <br />(1970) for generally lower-gradient channels and one developed in this study <br />for higher-gradient channels. In this report, a higher-gradient stream is <br />defined as one having slopes greater than 0.002. The Limerinos equation is, <br />however, valid on streams steeper than 0.002, but its upper limit has not been <br />ascertained. <br /> <br />Equation for predicting roughness coefficients of lower-gradient natural <br />channels <br /> <br />Limerinos (1970) related n to hydraulic radius and particle size, based <br />on samples from 11 predominantly lower-gradient stream channels having bed <br />material ranging from small gravel to medium-size boulders. Particles have <br />three different diameters or dimensions--Iength, width, and thickness--and <br />generally are oriented so that length and width are about parallel to the <br />plane of the streambed. Limerinos (1970) related n to minimum diameter <br />(thickness) and to intermediate diameter (width); his equation using inter- <br />mediate diameter seems to be the most useful because this dimension is the one <br />most easily measured by screening, by photographs, and by onsite evaluation. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.