My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08739
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08739
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:15:25 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:49:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Determination of Roughness Coefficients for Streams in Colorado
Date
1/1/1985
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In <br />need to <br />reach. <br />area I <br />trees) <br /> <br />wide, flat sections of the overbanks, subdivisions based on roughness <br />be made where the roughness changes, if they occur throughout the <br />The left overbank shown in figure 4 needs to be subdivided into sub- <br />(pasture) having an n value of 0.05 and subarea 2 (dense growth of <br />having an n value of 0.12. <br /> <br />ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS <br /> <br />An understanding of the basic factors that affect roughness coefficients <br />in channels and overbanks are needed for the selection of Manning's n. In <br />general, the roughness coefficient is a measure of the effect that bed mate- <br />rial, channel geometry, vegetation type and density, and other factors have on <br />flow resistance. Consequently, any factors that increase flow resistance <br />increase the roughness coefficient, and factors that decrease flow resistance <br />decrease the roughness coefficient. <br /> <br />The roughness can vary greatly with changes in stage and discharge and <br />the seasonal changes in vegetation. The variation with stage and discharge is <br />particularly important in higher-gradient mountain streams. The general <br />approach to evaluate roughness outlined in this section consists of evaluating <br />the channel roughness (base n value), modifying the base value by adjustment <br />factors, and evaluating the roughness of the overbanks. The discussion is <br />further divided into natural, agricultural, and urban conditions. <br /> <br />General Approach <br /> <br />The general approach for estimating n values consists of the selection of <br />a base roughness value for a straight, uniform, smooth channel in the materi- <br />als involved, then, through a consideration of various factors, modifying <br />values are added to the base n value to obtain the n value for the channel <br />under consideration (Chow, 1959; Cowan, 1956). <br /> <br />The n value for a given depth of flow may be calculated by the general <br />equation <br /> <br />n = (nO+nt+n2+n3+n4) m <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />where <br />no is the base value for a straight uniform channel; <br />nt is the additive value due to the effect of cross-section irregularity; <br />nz is the additive value due to variations of the channel; <br />n3 is the additive value due to the relative effect of obstructions; <br />n4 is the additive value due to the type and density of vegetation; and <br />m represents a value for the degree of meandering used to multiply the <br />sum of the previous values. <br /> <br />Although the base and modifying values are interrelated to some extent, <br />it is important that each factor be examined and considered independently and <br />the effects not duplicated. Cowan (1956) indicates this method has not been <br />verified on channels where hydraulic radius exceeds 15 ft. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.