Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I 8. I Miscellaneous Impacts and Unknowns. A weight of 15 out of 100 is assigned to this <br /> factor. The project benefits are considered separately. <br /> Weight <br /> 10 <br /> <br />The following table presents a matrix which was prepared in order to evaluate the alternatives. The <br />matrix includes a brief statement related to each of the factors discussed above for the entire alternative <br />and key and components. The matrix was presented to the Colorado Water Conservation District, City <br />of Sterling and Logan County for initial rlIDking. Results of this ranking were then presented at a <br />public forum on January 16, 1997. Input from the public at large was received an added to the tables <br />for the final ranking. <br /> <br />The results of the analysis indicate that Altemative No.5 is the most beneficial project to pursue. This <br />alternative ranked highest among the six alternatives evaluated because it provides a relatively large <br />benefit for the cost. <br /> <br />III-IS <br />