Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />and crosses the floodplain at a severe angle of skew. The <br />elevated road surface would cause the water surface to rise <br />to a wide floodplain immediately upstream of the crossing. <br />An industrial greenhouse complex encroaches into the <br />resulting floodplain. <br /> <br />include the 160th Avenue crossing, which would be submerged <br />to a depth of 8.6 feet. Several farmsteads would be <br />inundated along the fringes of this pond, as well as one <br />located in the overbank area upstream of the 160th Avenue <br />crossing. <br /> <br />3. A major flow obstruction results from the Union Pacific <br />Railroad crossing, which spans the floodplain atop an <br />embankment upstream of Colorado Boulevard. The culvert <br />through this embankment is sized for a storm smaller than <br />the 10-year event. Di scharges exceedi ng thi s frequency <br />wou 1 d overtop the embankment near its intersect i on with <br />168th Avenue. At this site, the configuration of the <br />highway and the railroad embankment would split the flood <br />flows, causing half to flow north over 168th Avenue, and <br />half to flow east over the railroad embankment. <br /> <br />Floodplain and Floodway Data <br /> <br />The Flood Hazard Area Delineation Floodplain Maps show the outline of the <br />100-year flood event for present channel and floodplain conditions. The <br />drawings are supplemented by Table VII, "Floodplain and Floodway Reference <br />Data. " <br /> <br />The northern flow is not addressed, since it would exit the <br />study area as it crosses 168th Avenue. However, the <br />eastern flow over the rail road embankment would return to <br />the Big Dry Creek channel along the reach between the <br />railroad embankment and 168th Avenue. Topographic features <br />in this area would distribute the return flow along much of <br />the reach length. <br /> <br />Table VII presents a listing of descriptive information, 100-year flood <br />discharges, stream stationing, thalweg elevations, 100-year flood <br />elevations, 100-year floodplain widths, and average channel velocities at <br />cross sections used in this study. <br /> <br />The floodplain is illustrated for this distributed flow <br />situation, as well as for the situation which would result <br />if the culvert at the rail road crossing were improved to <br />convey the 100-year flow. The floodway along this reach is <br />calculated for the latter situation only. <br /> <br />The floodway data in this table define the area required to convey the <br />100-year flood without causing significant increases in stage or velocity <br />due to future development outs i de the estab 1 i shed fl oodway. The fl oodway <br />was determined based on the criterion specified by the Urban Drainage and <br />Flood Control District which allows a maximum rise of 0.5 feet in the <br />energy grade line, assuming approximately equal reductions in conveyance on <br />both sides of the floodplain. The floodway is a high hazard area <br />characterized by relatively deep water and high flow velocities and should <br />remain free of any development which would obstruct flow. <br /> <br />4. The Union Pacific Railroad embankment rises 32 feet above <br />the channel thalweg at the crossing structure. The <br />upstream inundation resulting from a 100-year flood would <br />form a pond of approximately 2800 acre-feet in volume <br />upstream of the embankment. The extent of this pond would <br /> <br />The floodway data consist of floodway widths to the right and left of the <br />channel station line, the total floodway width, the mean velocity in the <br />floodway, and the 100-year flood elevations resulting from flows being <br />confined to the floodway. <br /> <br />15 <br />