Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. I~7RODuC~ION <br />I.A. Authorization <br /> <br /><lna no <br />basin. <br /> <br />major drainageways or ctrainaqe <br />Due to the lack of definition <br /> <br />f"cilities <br /> <br />this report. <br />exigt in the <br /> <br />5. Analysis of the hydraulics for the basin to <br />determine the extent and severity of existing and <br />projected future floodinq. <br />6. Damage assessments within flood prone areils. <br />7. Preparation of preliminary designs and cost <br />estimates for the most feasible alternative <br />improvement scheme. <br />8. Consistent evaluation of the alternatives and a <br />recommendation as to the best drainage improvement <br />scheme. <br />9. preparation of final report. <br /> <br />The West Vine Drainage Basin below Overland Trail is approxi- <br /> <br />mately 50 percent developed as of the writing of <br /> <br />of flood hazard areas <br /> <br />and major drainageways, development has occurred over the <br />historical flow path and consequently, some of these develop- <br />ments have experienced frequent and rather serious drainage <br />related problems. In an effort to alleviate the drainage <br />problems which already exist and to insure that future develop- <br />ments are not constructed in flood hazard areas, the City of <br />Fort Collins,in cooperation with the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board (CWCB), initiated a study of the basin referred to as <br />the West Vine Drainage Basin Study. In June of 1980 Engineering <br />Professionals. Inc. ';la5 retained by the City to prepare the <br />study. In response to the contract for said project, the study <br />has now been completed and the results are included herein. <br />LB. Scope <br /> <br />I.C. ~cknowledgements <br /> <br />A TeChnical Committee was established by the City to administer <br />the West Vine Drainage Basin Study. The committee consisted <br />of Marc Engemoen and Bob Smith of the City's Engineering Services <br />Division, and Randy Seaholm of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board. Throughout the course of this study valuable assistance <br />and information was given by these individuals, and their help <br />has been greatly appreciated. DClring the prclininary invostiga- <br />tion~ phase of this projeot, mPctings Were held with the various <br />entities which affect and/or are affcc-ccd by stOHt runoff within <br />the drainage basin. These entities dnd th~ individuals 3ssoci~t€d <br />with each are listed as follows' <br /> <br />The purpose for this drainage study was two-fold. One major <br />objective was to delineate flood hazard areas and to determine <br />the potential severity of flooding in said areas. The second <br />major objective was to prep~re alternative drainage improvement <br />schemes and rrovide sufficient data to allow evaluation of the <br />alternatives to arrive at the best alternative drainage <br />improvement scheme bilsed on technical. economic and Pllblic <br />acceptance criteria. <br /> <br />Ditch Comoanies <br />Pleasant Valley and Lake canal - John Michie <br />~ew Mercer Canal - LOuis Swift <br />Larim8r County No. 2 Canal Glen Johnson <br />Arthur Irrigation Company - Calvin Johnson <br />Colorado S-cate University <br />Dr. ~orman Evans <br />Robert eurnha", <br />Richard Hollar <br />POCldre SchOOl District R-I <br />,-._--- <br />.ray Holeman <br />The cooperation of all of these indivuals is acknowleilged and <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />In or<1F'r to ac<"ompl ish th.. stat."<l nojP<"tj"""', ~h.. "t',ily <br />involVed the following rrajor work taSks, <br />1. Collection of field data. <br />2. compilation and evaluation of existing studies <br />and data for the study area. <br />3. Delineation of the drainage basin and subbasins. <br />4. Analysis of existing and proj€'<:,tE'G tutur>' hydrology <br />for the basin. <br /> <br />J . <br /> <br /><!relltly ,~pp_t"eci<~t~d. <br /> <br />-l- <br /> <br />-<- <br />