My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08571
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:14:56 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:44:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Fort Collins
Stream Name
West Vine Drainage Basin
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning
Date
12/1/1980
Prepared For
Fort Collins
Prepared By
Engineering Professionals
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the affects of the irrigation canals on the basin hydrology <br />were ignored. The assumption was made that the ditches could <br />carr" aoorQxi~~tely 25 percent more than their decre~ct water right$ <br />, .. . (]2) <br />which are approximately US cfs, 155 cfs, 141 cfs, and 95 cfs <br />for the Pleasant Valley and r~ke Canal, ~ew ~ercer Canal, <br />Larimer County No. 2 Canal, and the Arthur Irrigation Ditch <br />respectively. Based on this assumption the New Mercer and the <br />Larimer County NO. 2 which would be most influential in basin <br />hydrology can only carry approximately 10.0 percent of the 100 <br />year existing storm runoff flows which traverse the ditches. <br />TO further substantiate the assumption that the ditches will have <br />minor impact on future hydrology, the photog~aphs included on pages <br />11 - 13 of this ~eport were taken on May 13, 1930, and no <br />irrigation water was turned into the ditches until June 2, 1980. <br />The New ~ercer and Ltlrimcr County ~o. 2 appeared to be flowing <br />at approximately two thirds capacity with only minor storm inflow. <br />In addition, a3 the WCGt Vine Drainage BaSin ~ecomes fully <br />developed and the drainage basins between the West Vine Drainage <br />Basin and the Cache La Poudrc Riv(:>r develop, the canals will <br />not have significant capacity, especially during the irrigation <br />season. Also, as the West Vine Basin devolo~s, current policy <br />o( t.he ,]itch companies will discourdge tht'-us" of th.. cdnals <br />for intercepting urban storm runoff. <br /> <br />aCcurate and representative of physical characteristics as <br />possible. The individual parameters are dis~ussed as follows: <br />1. Impervious AJ;;oa rercen~,=- <br />Impervious areas were actually measured for each <br />subbasin from the base maps provided by the City. <br />In many undeveloped agricultural areas, less <br />than 5 percent of the total subbasin area was <br />impervious. However, through mutual agreement <br />with the TeChnical COft',nittee, it was decided <br />that no less than 5 percent of the total area <br />would be used as impervious area, eVen if measure- <br />ments indicated the actual percentage was less. <br />2. Overland Flow Lengths <br />Overland flow lengthS were determined by <br />measurement on the 100 scale orthophotos. <br />As many lengths as necessary to represent the <br />subbasin wer" scaled from the maps and the <br />average length was used. <br />J. Detention ilnd Pepression Storaqe <br />For all subbasins, th() imoervious Storiiq", wdS <br />assumed to be 0.067 ill. '<'h<" surface storage fo~ <br />~erviQl1s areilS ranqed from 0.20 in. to 0.30 in. <br />For corr.pletely undeveloped, ayricultural subbasins, <br />0.30 in. was used for surface storage and f<:>r <br />fully developed, <br /> <br />The City of Fort Collins has recently initiated a project to <br />study consolidation of these f6ur irrigation canals. 'Che <br />scope of work will include de!termin.ltiO:l of th() 0ffects of <br />consolidation relating to many fi<c~ors, including protection <br />r>f ,,11 "'x;.Rti,,'J i,.-ri'J"torR IHhl '.1'"""" Rt"r'" rll"off. 'T'h'" f'ln<:,tio1"' <br />of the irrigatLon ditches relative to urban storm runoff could <br />change as a result of this study. <br /> <br />4" <br /> <br />Manning's Roughness Coefficient for <br />The Manning's roughness coefficient <br />used for impervious areas was 0.016. <br /> <br />subu~ban a"eas, 0.20 In. was USed. <br />(111 <br />Overland Flow <br /> <br />generally <br /> <br />However, <br /> <br />io <br /> <br />IV.E. Supbasin PaIan~!~rs <br />As mentioned pr-cvLO\:sly, th" reliilbility of results obtained <br />from s.,.,'.~.M. is ,'!cpcnden~ on the ab:lity to ;Jccurately <br />represent the physical characteristics of the subbasins. ~ethods <br />used to select subbasin parameters assured values were! as <br /> <br />suboasins where the llTlp"rV10us arei< basically <br />consisted of rock and/or rack outcrops, a roughness <br />coefficient of 0.020 W,1S used. !-lanninq's roughness <br />coefficient for ~rvious ~re~s ranged frox 0.20 <br />to 0.25. !"or ur.dcveloped, ilgrieultural subbasins <br />0.20 was ~scd and for lawn arasses 0.25 was used. <br /> <br />-17- -13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.