My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08536
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08536
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:14:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
El Paso
Community
Fountain
Stream Name
Fountain Creek, Jimmy Camp Creek
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Flood Insurance Study - City of Fountain
Date
12/5/1984
Prepared For
Fountain
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for Fountain, Jimmy <br />Camp, Security, and Widefield Creeks are shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />3.2 Hydr aulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding from the <br />sourceS studied were carried out to provide estimates of the eleva- <br />tions of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />Water-surface elevations of floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals were computed through use of the COE HEC-2 water-surface <br />profile computer program (Reference ]0). <br /> <br />Fountain Creek crf.i';:S sect. inns were obtained from maps compiled by <br />Bohannon '1llc1 Huston, Inc., in 1972 (Reference 11). Cross sections <br />for Jimmy Camp Creek were compiled from 1973 SCS aerial photography <br />(Reference 12), Cross sections for Security and Widefield Creeks <br />Were compiled from aerial topographic mapping prepared for the COE <br />by VTN, Inc., in 1976 (Reference 13). <br /> <br />Location" of ';elected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a floodway was computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway <br />Map (Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Channel roughne5s factc>rs (Manning's "n") used in the hydraulic <br />computations Were chosen by using engineering judgment and based <br />on field observations of the streams and flood plains. Channel <br />roughness values for the streams ranged from 0.015 to 0.040, with <br />overbank values ranged from 0,020 to 0.080. <br /> <br />Starting water-surface elevations were based on either coincident <br />condition elevations or critical-depth computations. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyseS for this study Were based on the assumption <br />that limited clogging of stream channels will occur and that all <br />bridges and flood-control structureS would remain intact, The <br />flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus considered valid <br />if hydraulic structures remain intact with little blockage, <br />operate properly, and do not fail, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />All elevations are referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical <br />Datum of 1929 (NGVD). Elevation reference marks used in this <br />study are shown on the maps. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4.0 <br /> <br />FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS <br /> <br />The NFIP encourages State and local governments to adopt sound flood <br />plain management programs. Therefore, each Flood Insurance Study produces <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.