My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08523
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:14:48 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:42:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Jefferson County
Stream Name
Buffalo Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Floods Following Fire Buffalo Creek Event of July 12, 1996
Date
8/1/1996
Prepared For
ASFPM 97 Conference
Prepared By
Browning & Hyde
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STORM CHARACTERISTICS AND RAINFALL INFORMATION <br /> <br />The summer storm that produced flooding in the Buffalo Creek area was a typical convective type <br />cloudburst event. These events are not uncommon along the foothills and plains ea~t of the <br />Continental Divide in Colorado. Storms like this fonn qcickly and can produce large amounts of <br />rainfall, hail, and severe weather conditions within a short amount of time. <br /> <br />At this time, only oreliminarv information is available describing the particular stornl over Buffalo <br />Creek. The preliminary information is based on field analyses, rain gage information, and <br />interviews with witnesses and local residents. The prelinunary information indicates that the storm <br />moved from west to east and then stalled right over the lower part of the Buffalo Creek watershed. <br />The most intense rainfall amounts, which fell over Buffalo Creek, are estimated to be from 2 inches <br />to 3.5 inches within 30 to 90 minutes. The storm may have covered an area between 10 and 30 <br />square miles. There is some uncertainty about the antecedent moisture conditions prior to the storm <br />event. Some evidence suggests that there may have been up to a half inch or inch of rain within a <br />few hours prior to the thunderstorm event, however there are conflicting reports from local <br />residents. It is not necessarily unconunon for Buffalo CI1~ek to receive rainfall totaling 2 inches. <br />However, the intensity or rate of the rain for this storm (heavy rain over a very short duration) may <br />be a much less frequent event. To provide a point of [(,ference, the lOO-year, l-hoUI precipitation <br />depth for southern Jefferson County is reported to be about 2.1 inches according to the Jefferson <br />County Storm Drainage Design and Criteria Manual. <br /> <br />To provide a more detailed reconstruction of the stonn ,~vent, all possible information i.s currently <br />being collected from the National Weather Service, private meteorologists, and other entities. A <br />reconstruction of the storm event from available radar images and other information is a necessary <br />part of analyzing the storm event. This information will help describe the storm's track, areal <br />extent, precipitation amounts, and intensities. Local residents have already been contacted to <br />determine rainfall amounts based on individual rain gages. The collection and analysis of more <br />detailed storm information is one of the most important elements in researching and reconstructing <br />this event. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY AND HYDJltAUUCS <br /> <br />Peak discharges for the July 12 event for the North Fork, Buffalo Creek, Sand Draw, and other <br />tributaries were estimated by the USGS and the Colorado Water Conservation Board. The ewCB <br />obtained detailed surveyed cross-sections on the North Fork, Sand Draw, and Buffalo Creek. The <br />cross-section locations were carefully chosen to avoid places that had unusually high amounts of <br />sediment deposition and places that may have had backwater or ponding effects from bridges or <br />other features. High water marks and channel slopes were surveyed. Discharge estimates were <br />made using Manning's equation with the collected field data. Since Manning's equation considers <br />only clear-water discharge, some of the Manning's '''n'' values were adjusted upward (by 20% or <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.