Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2-(>J't. <br /> <br />FLOODS FOLLOWING FIRE <br />Buffalo Creek Flood Ev{~nt of July 12, 1996 <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Prepared for ASFPM 1997 Annual Conference <br />"Floodplain Management in a Multifaceted World" <br /> <br />by <br />Thomas W. Browning, Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Brian R. Hyde, Colorado Wat',r Conservation Board <br /> <br />On the night of July 12, 1996, a flash flood occurred in the cDmmunity of Buffalo Creek, which is within an <br />unincorporated area of Jefferson County, Colorado. Buffalo Creek lies at an elevation of 6800 feet and is located about <br />30 miles southwest of Denver in the foothills of the Front Range. A thunderstorm in the area produced heavy rainfall <br />over a short period of time. Major flood flows occurred along Sand Draw, Buffalo Creek, the North Fork of the South <br />Platte River and several other tributary streams in the area. Two lives were lost as a direct result of the flooding. Roads, <br />bridges, utilities, public facilities, homes, outbuildings, ana vehicles were damaged or destroyed as well. The Buffalo <br />Creek flood event was trllly a disaster, with total flood related damage, estimated to be over 5 million dollars. <br /> <br />On May 18-19, 1996, less than two months prior to the flood event, an intense wildfire burned approximately 12,000 <br />acres of forested land in the Buffalo Creek area. Vegetative and sDil conditions in the severely burned areas of the <br />watershed were changed dramatically from their pre-fire conditions. The resulting hydrophobic (water repellent) soils <br />and the loss of vegetative cover and humus layer have greatly changed the hydrologic response of the affected watershed. <br />Based on field surveyed cross-sections and high water marKs, the July 12 flood flows on several streams in the Buffalo <br />Creek area were estimated to be from 7 to 25 times the published FEMA ] OO-yr flows. The S,md Draw_'O@tershed, which <br />experienced severe burning and has a drainage area of onlLLCi.sguare miles, produced unit dischill:r&s (~n the order of <br />5,000 cfs per SQuare mile during the flood. The rainfalll!mount has been preliminarily estimated to be slightly higher <br />than the published] -hour, l00-year rain for that area of Colorado. Unfortunately, the community will be at a high risk <br />for flash flooding for a very long time. Based upon previOLlS and current research, it will likely take tens of years for the <br />Buffalo Creek watershed to fully recover from the affects of the wildfire, if it does fully recover. <br /> <br />Forest fires, which can be triggered naturally or as a result of human activity, are a common occulTence in many area.' of <br />the United States. In Colorado, large portions of the Front Range as well as much of the high country in western <br />Colorado face very high forest fire danger (witness the deaOly Storm J(ing Mountain fire in 1994). Much of Colorado's <br />population growth is OCCUlTing in these fire-prone areas. The critical issue for floodplain managers, hydrologists, forest <br />managers, and meteorologists is to identify those communities and developed areas that are at high flood risk following <br />wildfires. As proven with the case of Buffalo Creek, two disasters can strike a community within a very short period of <br />time. <br /> <br />Both sh0l1-term and long-term mitigation strategies need to be in place so that floodplain managers and vulnerable <br />communities can be prepared for "floods following fire." The CWeB has developed a mitigation plan to assist the <br />community and the local government with pre- and post-flood considerations. The strategies presented in the mitigation <br />plan should help to lessen the loss of life and property when l1ash floods occur in the future. Those strategies can be <br />easily adapted to other flood prone communities within burned waters.heds, and within watersheds facing a high risk of <br />future fires. One of the most exciting and important aspects of the nood documentation and mitigation planning was the <br />involvement and cooperation of local residents and numerouS fecleral, Slate, and local government agencies. <br /> <br />Within the proposed paper/presentation for this conference, the CWCB will be presenting information regarding <br />documentation of the fire and flood events. In addition. the Buffalo Creele mitigation plan will be presented as a model <br />for other fire/flood prone communities. The integration of numerous disciplines and agencies as well as multiple natural <br />hazards within the mitigation plan truly rJpresents multi-faceted flooclplain management. <br />