My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08489
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08489
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:14:43 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:41:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Determination of Urban Watershed Response Time
Date
12/1/1974
Prepared By
E.F. Shulz and O.G. Lopez
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ is the Espey Channelization factor <br />cf is the watershed imperviousness factor <br />cf = 1 - Ri <br />Ri is the ratio of impervious watershed to <br />pervious watershed. <br /> <br />The regressiQn equation was tested using an indepen- <br />dent set of data measured from Boneyard Creek at <br />Urbana, Illinois. <br /> <br />USE OF STATISTICAL METHODS <br /> <br />The majority of the recent investigations on the <br />effects of urbanization on flood hydrology have used <br />some of the techniques of statistics dealing with cor- <br />relation and regression. More effective techniques <br />have been under development. Multivariate techniques <br />are better suited to many problems in hydrology. <br />Johnstone and Cross (1949) illustrated the application <br />of correlation and regression in hydrology. Several <br />examples of the test of significance are also given in <br />this book. A more thorough treatment of the applica- <br />tion of correlation to problems in hydrology was given <br />by Beard (1962). Beard discussed the matters of mul- <br />tiple correlation, nondetermination and criteria of <br />statistical reliability. <br /> <br />With the advent of the high speed digital com- <br />puter, several improved procedures for complete multi- <br />ple regression techniques evolved. These methods along <br />with useful hints regarding their operation are given <br />in a book by Draper and Smith (1966). Davis and Samp- <br />son (1973) give and discuss a number of computer pro- <br />grams written in Fortran for applying multiple regres.- <br />sion and multivariate analysis. Reich (1962) utilized <br />a stepwise multiple regression technique for selecting <br />most effective regression equations between independent> <br />and dependent hydrologic variables. <br /> <br />Stepwi..6e. Mui..tipie. RegJLe.6.!o..i.on. -- In applying the <br />stepwise multiple regression procedure, one independent <br />variable is entered into the regression equation at a <br />time and the coefficient of determination is found. <br />The independent variable which yields the highest co- <br />efficient of determination is selected. Following the <br />selection of the initial independent variable, the re- <br />maining independent variables are sequentially added <br />to the regression equation and unexplained variance is <br />computed. The independent variable which achieves the <br />greatest reduction in the unexplained variance is the <br />second independent variable added to the regression <br />equation. The selection process is repeated -- each <br />time a selection is made from the remaining independent <br />variables until all of the independent variables have <br />been added. <br /> <br />In the practical case, all of the independent <br />variables are seldom actually used in the operational <br />regression equation. This is because of the problem <br />of limited amoun~s of hydrologic data and the exces- <br />sive costs involved in continuing the acquisition of <br /> <br />large amounts of data. For this reason, early in the <br />stepwise multiple regression analysis the matter of <br />the "best regression equationll is considered. Draper <br />and Smith (1966) suggest six general procedures in <br />which this selection may be achieved: <br /> <br />1) All possible regressions, <br />2) Backward elimination, <br />3) Forward selection, <br />4) Stepwise regression, <br />5) Two variations on the four previous methods, <br />6) Stagewise regression. <br /> <br />In general the fourth method, "Stepwise Regression" is <br />the method used in the investigation reported herein. <br />A computer program for completing these computations <br />is available as a standard software package at the CSU <br />Computer Center (STAT 38R-BDM02R revised). <br /> <br />SIGNIFICANT PARAMETERS OF URBANIZATION <br /> <br />There are many examples of a comparison of two or <br />more photographs taken over intervals of time which <br />graphically depict the evolution of an urban region. <br />These comparisons witness to the fact that urbanization <br />produces a profound change in the Watershed. The ex- <br />tent of the changes caused by urbanization on the hy- <br />drology of the watershed vary somewhat with local geo- <br />logy, local customs, local laws, local climate and the <br />intensity of the urban development. There is a need <br />to be able to express ~he urbanization process quanti- <br />tatively. Schulz (1971) listed eight measures which <br />could be applied to quantify the urbanization. These <br />were discussed in some detail. <br /> <br />) I P'-""en.t o. ImpeJw.coU1> W,ueMhed, <br />21 Le"gth o. S.tJt.ee.U Md Roado pel>. UrU.t a. Mea, <br />31 Length o. Paved S.tJt.ee.U pel>. urU.t 06 AlLea, <br />41 Length 06 CWLbed a"d Gu.t.tel>.ed S.tJLee.U pel>. UrU.t <br />o. AlLea, <br />51 Le"gth 06 Stol11>1 Sewel>. Condu..i..t pel>. UrU.t o. <br />Mea, <br />61 Ennec.Uve CMfme1. Ro~gh""M a. F.toodwa.y., <br />71 O.-Sill F.tood Ve.ten.tum StolW.ge, <br />81 Popu.f.aW" VeM.i.ty .c. W,ueMhed. <br /> <br />Beginning ~ith this list of factors of urbaniza- <br />tion, Lopez (1973) carried out a stepwise multiple re- <br />gression analysis to select the most effective factors <br />of urbanization. <br /> <br />WMeJL6hed ImpeJtvlou.6nu.6. -- Referring to the re- <br />sume of previous research work, the most obvious mea- <br />sure of urbanization is the proportion of impervious <br />watershed. This measure was listed by Schulz (1971) <br />and used by Lopez (1973). The factor influences th~ <br />hydrology in two ways: <br /> <br />1) Reduction of Inflitration, <br />2) Reduction of Response Time. <br /> <br />Waananen (1969) shows two cases in different parts of <br />the United States, where the water yield from a water- <br />shed has been increased by urbanization. The explana- <br />tion is that the paved and roof surfaced replace <br />natural soil surfaces which in their former state have <br />infiltered rainwater and in return lost water by <br />evapotranspiration. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.