Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COMMENTARY <br />Sf-IEET70f45 <br />STATION 1916+00 TO 1972+00 <br />REACH 1 <br /> <br />CiJ'1MENTARY <br />SHEET7OF45 <br />STAT10N 1916+00 TO 1972+OO <br />REACH 1 <br />(Continued) <br /> <br />The southern portion of the floodpla1n on this sheet consists oft he South <br />Platte Park (Littleton Floodplain Park). Further north the floodplain <br />begins to encroach on the City of Col<Kllbine Valley. The river itself <br />meanders considerably with several sharp bends. Lateral migration is <br />evident in distances up to 800 feet. Bank erosion exists and in some <br />places is severe. <br /> <br />will be reduced significantly, most specifically downstream of Station <br />1940+00, floodplain re9ulations should be superimposed on therecOIllTlended <br />improvements. Prior to theconstruct1on of the recorrmended improvements, <br />floodplain management practices should be in accord with the flOOd hazard <br />identified fOr ti1e existing channel conditions. <br /> <br />The improvements proposed to the southern portion of this reach are limiteo <br />to protection of bank frem erosion. At Station 1940+00 the delineation <br />between Reaci1 I and Reach 2 exists. Reach I will be protected using prima- <br />rily vegetation or riprap with vegetation in order to stabilize the channel <br />banks. The northern portion of ti1is sheet is located within Reach 2 and is <br />the area of th<> Corps of Engineers proposed chan~el improvements. These <br />improvement> are being designed and constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers. <br /> <br />COST ESTlMATE <br />SHEET 7 OF 45 <br />SOUTH PLATTE RIVER <br />STATION 1916+00 TO STATION 1972+00 <br /> <br />Bank protection prodded in this study inCludes riprap with vegetation as <br />,hown on ~tail II on Sheet 44 between Stations 1956+50 and 1972+00. Thi, <br />protection is located along the west channel bank as intended to protect <br />the overhank gravel pit lake embankment from erosion. Between Stations <br />1940+00 and 1956+50 v~etation is proposed along portions Of both banks in <br />order to prevent erosion andmeanderlng of ti1eriver. Only the portion of <br />the banks exposed to less frequent floods will be protected solely by vege- <br />tation. Thelowflowchannelwi11 be protected with riprap. <br /> <br />CONSTRUCTION <br /> <br />Orainage improvement costs <br />Street crossing costs <br />Utility relocation costs <br />Total construction costs <br /> <br />$713,100 <br /> <br />Engineering and contingencies <br />(3~ of total construction costs) <br /> <br />213,100 <br />63,900 <br /> <br />In areaswl1ere there is no reolJCtion in the flOOdplain limits, floodplain <br />regulations shnulrJ ho> pnfnrcP<i. This will inswe that no il11prudent devel_ <br />oP'llent OCCtJl', in the 100-year floodolain. In areas wI1ere the floodplain <br /> <br />Property acquisition <br />TOTAL :MPROVE~ENT COSTS <br /> <br />Operation and Maintenance <br /> <br />277,000 <br />~13,320 <br />