Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />SYLLABUS <br /> <br />This report comprises the results of an investigation of the <br />flood and all led problems along the Arkansas River and its tributaries <br />at and in the vicinity of Las Animas, Colorado. Las Animas is located <br />on the south bank of the Arkansas River just above its confluence with <br />the Purgatoire River, a major' tributary which enters from the south. <br />The flood plain in this area Includes urban and suburban lands and <br />improvements; irrigated and grazing lands and improvements, highways, <br />and rai Iroads. A small area of the flood plain also is subject to <br />inundation from very rare floods on the Purgatoire River. Under <br />special authorizations during the period from 1950 to 1956, the Corps <br />of Engineers constructed a pi lot channel and installed bank stabl Ilza- <br />tion works along the Arkansas River at Las Animas. Several years later, <br />local interests extended the pilot channel downstream. These works <br />provide protection against frequent sma I I floods. Flooding of rural <br />lands begins with a flow of 6,500 c.f.s. and urban areas with flows <br />of 10,000 c.t.s. <br /> <br />The largest recorded floods on the Arkansas River at Las Animas <br />occurred in 1921 and 1955 when estimated peak discharges of 187,000 <br />c.f.s. and 44,000 c.f.s., respectively, were reached. Barrier Dam, <br />constructed In 1924-25 on the Arkansas River about 6 miles above <br />Pueblo by the Pueblo Conservancy District, would have reduced the <br />1921 flood to 140,000 c.f.s. Recurrence of the 1921 and 1955 floods <br />under the ex i st i ng state of deve lopment wou I d cause damages of <br />$3,135,000 and $275,000, respectively. A multiple-purpose reservoir <br />project has been authorized for construction by the U.S. Bureau of <br />Reclamation at the Pueblo dam site on the Arkansas' River at approxi- <br />mately the same site as the Barrier Dam. This project is an element <br />of the authorized Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. If the Pueblo Dam had <br />been In operation, the peak discharge of the 1921 flood would have <br />been reduced to 108,000 c.f.s. at Las Animas and the 1955 flood would <br />have been reduced to 38,000 c.f.s. The damages from floods of these <br />magnitudes under the existing state of development would be $2,490,000 <br />and $152,000, respectively. <br /> <br />During the public hearings, channel straightening and Installation <br />of steel jetties were suggested as a solution to the flood problem. <br />However, during subsequent meetings and conferences with local Interests, <br />they expressed the opinion that channelization alone would not solve <br />the problem and that levees also would be required to provide adequate <br />flood contro I . <br /> <br />The water resources problems in the Arkansas River Basin In <br />Colorado and possible solutions were investigated in a comprehensive <br />basin study conducted during the period 1950 to 1955 by interested <br />Federal and State agencies. The report thereon presented a long-range <br />plan for the development and uti lization of the water and land re- <br />sources of the Arkansas, White, and Red River Basins. The plan <br /> <br />