FLOOD08460

• County: Statewide
• Basin: Statewide
• Title: Stewardship of Colorado Stream Corridors
• Date: 1/1/1998
• Prepared For: CWCB
• Prepared By: McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
• Floodplain - Doc Type: Floodplain Report/Masterplan

I

I

I

Need

I

I

I

Figure 3
FUNDING IMPLEMENTATION

. Lack of Funding
. Did Not Have A Funding Mechanism
. Desire Funding
. Planning Assistance for Planning and Implementing

Preferences

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

60
:E'
'2
,
~ 50
o
u
.
E
l,g 40
6 ~
0.0
~ 8-
~ ~ 30
o "
ii ~
.c 0
E 0
i .s 20
!
o
E
~ 10
.
~
'"
.
~

Fundi n9 Mechanism Preferences

o

. L
. . 0> 0>
C . 0 .!: E
. '6
~ "- -0.
0 0'-
'" ~ , ~ 0
"- "- ~
. ~
" " - u
w w
~ =::;
-0 0
W
"-

13
"
o.~
'-0
5c
uw
~~
-0
"-,
0.
E

W
0>
~
o
"m III
- W
OW
E"-
"
u;

W
0>
~
,
"(ij.?;-
o~
E"
"
u;

.
~
0-
w
.
"

13
"
'"
-go
~-
. '
" w
2 E
~ w
;:g>
o
~
::;

0>
o
"
0-0
> 0
W ~
a:"-
w,
,,~
~~
"
u;
Type of Funding Mechanisms

"
'<3
w
0.
<fl

Note I: 36% of respondents stated a lack of funding was the primary ohstacle to planning and implementing
improvements.

I

Note 2: 70% of respondents stated they did not have a funding mechanism or had an ineffective funding mechanism.

I

Note 3: Other preferences include Loans, No Tax-Based Funding, State Funding, Cost Share Program. Go Co
Money. Capital Projects,

I

I