My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08374
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD08374
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:14:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:33:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
New England
Basin
Statewide
Title
Modelling the Dynamic Response of Floodplains to Urbanization in Eastern New England Completion Report
Date
1/1/1978
Prepared By
CSU Environmental Resources Center
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-13- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />combined in a predictive model. Watershed boundaries were first drawn <br />on the topographic quadrangles following generally accepted procedures <br />which involve the isolation of all surface drainage above a stream gaging <br />point and require the crossing of all contour lines at right angles. <br />Although these techniques are something of an art, they are generally <br />quite reproducible in fluvial terrain. In the glacial terrain of south- <br />eastern New England, however, greater uncertainty in the precise location <br /> <br />of drainage divides arises from two factors: the presence of broad areas <br /> <br />having low relief which is imperfectly portrayed by the fixed contour <br />interval of ten feet; and the occurrence of wetland areas which drain <br /> <br /> <br />both into and out of a watershed, and therefore lie on the divide. Such <br /> <br /> <br />inaccuracies might be expected to cancel somewhat as they accumulate, <br /> <br /> <br />but errors as large as a few percent may exist in various areal data. <br /> <br />Delineation of the drainage network was a matter of concern since <br /> <br />several possible elements of the predictive model would be dependent on <br />it. The glacial history of the study region has left a strong imprint <br />on the drainage composition. Lakes, small ponds and wetland areas are <br />abundant, and the drainage is deranged in many places, being neither <br />closely related to the topography nor in a state of even approximate <br />equilibrium. The majority of channels are permanent and some of the <br />drainage is artificial. Because of these factors, any standard methods <br />of quantitative measurement can only be approximate. One would expect <br />all potential elements of the drainage network to be active during peak <br />flow conditions. Therefore, it might be most appropriate to identify all <br />such channels through detailed topographic analysis of contour crenula- <br /> <br /> <br />tions and interpretation of stereo photographs. However, the great a- <br /> <br /> <br />mount of labor involved in accomplishing this task for a total watershed <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.