Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's "n") used in the hydraulic computations (shown in Table <br />4) were chosen by engineering judgment, based on both aerial photographs and field <br />ohservation of the channels and floodplain areas, <br /> <br />Starting water-surface elevations were either based on coincident condition elevations, the <br />slope-area method, or elevations of an adjacent study, <br /> <br />Generally, the distances on the flood profiles correspond to distances measured along the <br />centerline of the designated watercourses, Along Williams Canyon, however, the low-flow <br />is carried through a I, ]OO-foot concrete box culvert under Canon Avenue near to the <br />confluence with Fountain Creek, In this area, the divergence of the low-flow drainage <br />necessitated the use of distances measured along the centerline of the lOO-year flood path, <br />On the maps, this flow line. used to establish profile distances, is delineated and labeled as <br />the Profile Base Line, <br /> <br />The hydraulic analysis for Fountain Creek as developed by the USACE is based on an <br />assumption of limited clogging, The USACE considers limited clogging to be 10 percent of <br />culvert areas and I foot on each side of bridge piers, These values may vary from structure <br />to structure, depending on field elevation of structure configuration, <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for the remainder of this study were based on unobstructed flow, The <br />flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus considered valid only if hydraulic structures <br />remain unobstructed, operate properly, and do not fail. <br /> <br />Supercritical and critical flow conditions predominate in the Upper Monument Creek reach <br />and the Monument Creek Tributary due to steep channels, Water-surface elevations at cross <br />sections in these reaches are based on critical depth, Starting water-surface elevations are <br />based on critical depth or the corresponding water-surface elevations at the confluence of two <br />streams (Reference 6), <br /> <br />A split flow occurs on Pine Creek at the Colorado State Highway 83 crossing due to the <br />limited capacity of the culvert. Because the roadway embankment is sufficiently high to <br />divert flows above 1,200 cfs to the south, all recurrence intervals coincide with the ]OO-year <br />flood on the Pine Creek Overflow profile, <br /> <br />Flow breakouts for floods greater than the lO-year discharge on Fountain Creek occur at the <br />U ,S, Highway 24 bridge crossing in Manitou Springs, These breakouts flow through the <br />Manitou Avenue underpass and rejoin Fountain Creek at Cross Section C. As a result, the <br />peak discharges for the 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods were reduced 700, 2,100, and 9,250 <br />cfs. respectively, <br /> <br />For Crystal Creek and Dirty Woman Creek, culvert capacities are sufficient to pass the ]00- <br />year flow at all but two stream crossings, Both Beacon Light Road over Crystal Creek and <br />the Denver Road over Dirty Woman Creek are inadequately sized, The backed-up water <br />temporarily floods only unused barren land and the peak flows downstream from these roads <br />are attenuated to a certain degree during high frequency flooding events (common flood <br />events), Should the land upstream from either road be developed, the culvert size should be <br />increased. <br /> <br />32 <br />