My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08354
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD08354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:14:20 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:32:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Lafayette
Stream Name
Coal Creek , Waneka Reservoir
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Basinwide Planning
Date
12/1/1980
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
Camp Dresser & McKee
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Alternative 2A was selected for further development during Phase B. Alter- <br />native 2A recommendations included: (1) Establish a system of channels through- <br />out the basin that have a 10-year historic runoff capacity; (2) diversion of all <br />surface drainage flows to the new drainageway system; (3) sizing of culverts at <br />all major drainageway and arterial roadway crossings to 100-year capacities and <br />at local and collector roadway crossings to 10-year design capacities; (4) the <br />utilization of existing drainage facilities wherever possible; (5) enforcement <br />of a bas i nwi de detent i on po 1 icy whereby future development is requi red to 1 i mit <br />the 2-, 10- and 100-year runoff peaks to historic (undeveloped) levels. <br /> <br />7. In developing needed channel cross-sections and longitudinal slopes, <br />utilize the following limits: a) maximum depth 5 feet; b) maximum <br />100-year velocity 7.0 fps; c) side slopes of 4:1 or flatter. <br /> <br />8. New development in the basins provide on-site erosion control during <br />construction and provide on-site detention control for the 2-, 10- and <br />100-year fl ows when the site is developed. <br /> <br />9. Work with the planning departments of Lafayette and Boulder County to <br />develop a hydrologic land use in the Phase B report acceptable to both. <br /> <br />Recommended Alternative <br /> <br />During the review process of the Phase A study, the input of officials from the <br />City of Lafayette, Boulder County and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control <br />District was used to select a recommended alternative. Based on this review <br /> <br />Basinwide Major Drainageway Plan Improvements <br /> <br />The selected alternate drainageway plan utilizes 4 to 1 side sloped, grass-lined <br />channels having concrete trickle channel inverts for all of the major drainage <br />basins delineated during the development of Alternative 2A, All major drainage <br /> <br />improvements are designed for future basin development conditions and assume <br />that mandatory on-site detention requirements will be enforced to limit fl ows of <br /> <br />The selected plan by the project sponsors included the following direction: <br /> <br />the 2-, 10-and 100-year return frequencies to historic levels, The planned <br />major basin improvements are briefly summarized below for each Major Drainage <br />Sub-Basin shown in Figure 2. <br /> <br />1. Recommend in the plan the enforcement of the lOO-year floodplain <br />regulations in the state designated floodplains. <br /> <br />2. Discuss clearly the need for regulating a residual 100-year floodplain <br />that may remain after a plan to handle less than IOO-year flood is <br />implemented, Point out that 100-year potential flood zones need to be <br />controlled through the development process until modified by actual <br />construction of drainageways, Planning or anticipating changes does not <br />justify controlling anything less than the potential floodplain areas <br />defined using existing ground conditions. <br /> <br />3. Encourage purchase of fl ood insurance for pro pert i es ident i fi ed as <br />susceptible to flooding. <br /> <br />4, All storm runoff des i gn be in accordance wi th the "Storm Dra i nage <br />Design and Technical Criteria." <br /> <br />Major Sub-Basin 1: Construction of a 10-year capacity, 4:1 side sloped, <br /> <br /> <br />grass-lined channel from Coal Creek to North 119th Street. The improvements <br /> <br /> <br />include lOO-year capacity crossings under the Weld County Road, with 10-year <br /> <br />capacity cul verts under all the other road crossi ngs and under the Chicago, <br />Burlington and Quincy Railroad tracks, <br /> <br />Major Sub-Basin 2: Construction of 10~year capacity, 4:1 grass-lined channel <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Develop a major drainageway plan utilizing Alternatives 2 and 2A by <br />identifying additional freeboard needs for adjacent structures when <br />using the 2A concept, <br /> <br />Provide for adequate maintenance access to all improvements. Any <br />maintenance trail should have a minimum stabilized flat surface width <br />of 10 feet. <br /> <br />from Coal Creek to North lllth Street. The development of a park containing a <br />trickle channel along the low point of the drainageway, from North 119th Street <br />and North lllth Street has also been included, Other improvements include <br />culverts with a 10-year capacity at Weld County Road and at the Chicago, <br />Burlington and Quincy Railroad and 10-year capacity culverts at North 119th and <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.