Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A survey of predominant soils indicates that the penneability of this soil <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br />5-MINUTE INCREMENT, 2-HOUR DURATION DESIGN STORMS <br /> <br />association ranges from .2 inches per hour to 6.0 inches per hour, with the <br /> <br />majority of this soil group having a range of penneabil ity between 2.0 inches <br /> <br />City of Lafayette, Colorado <br />For Use With The Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure <br /> <br />per hour to 6.0 inches per hour. <br /> <br />Time <br />(Minutes) <br /> <br />Incremental Rainfall Depth/Return Period <br />2 r. 5 r. 10 r. 100 r. <br /> <br />5 <br />10 <br />15 <br />20 <br />25 <br />30 <br />35 <br />40 <br />45 <br />50 <br />55 <br />60 <br />65 <br />70 <br />75 <br />80 <br />85 <br />90 <br />95 <br />100 <br />105 <br />110 <br />115 <br />120 <br /> <br />.01 <br />.03 <br />.07 <br />.14 <br />.24 <br />.14 <br />.07 <br />,04 <br />.04 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />,01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br /> <br />1.04 <br /> <br />Total (2 hr) <br /> <br />.01 <br />.04 <br />,10 <br />.20 <br />.36 <br />.18 <br />.10 <br />.06 <br />.06 <br />.04 <br />.04 <br />.04 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br />.01 <br /> <br />1.27 <br /> <br />.02 <br />.05 <br />.12 <br />.24 <br />.43 <br />.19 <br />.12 <br />.07 <br />.07 <br />.05 <br />.05 <br />.05 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br />.02 <br /> <br />1. 76 <br /> <br />.03 <br />.05 <br />.11 <br />.22 <br />,41 <br />.68 <br />.38 <br />.22 <br />.14 <br />,14 <br />.11 <br />.11 <br />.11 <br />.05 <br />.05 <br />.05 <br />.05 <br />.05 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br />.03 <br /> <br />3.14 <br /> <br />For the purpose of computing the runoff losses for each sub-basin, the <br />infiltration losses were calculated using Horton's equation with initial and <br />final infiltration rates of 3.0 and .5 inches per hour respectively, and a decay <br />rate of .0018. Detention and depression storage for impervious areas was <br /> <br />estimated at .1 inches and .4 inches for the pervious areas. <br /> <br />Existing and Future Condition Hydrology <br /> <br />The values listed in Table 3 give the basic drainage basin data and resulting <br /> <br /> <br />peak f1 ow rates for both ex i st i ng and future development condit ions. for each <br /> <br />sub-basin shown on Drawing B. <br /> <br />The hydrology for the selected Alternative 2A recognizes the interception of <br /> <br /> <br />existing major drainage patterns, The stonn hydrographs developed in the Phase <br /> <br />B study utilized existing basin development conditions, since a policy of <br /> <br />on-site detention is a basic assumption made in Alternative 2A. Hydrographs for <br /> <br />the 10- and 100-year recurrence intervals at various locations along channels <br /> <br />Reference: Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Preliminary <br />Design Storm Procedure, Hydrology Research Program, <br />August 1979. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />for each planned major drainageway are shown on Figure 4. Flood discharge <br /> <br /> <br />profiles for each major drainageway are contained on Profile Sheets 1 through 6 <br /> <br />and are shown on Figure 3. <br /> <br />15 <br />