Laserfiche WebLink
<br />XII-4 <br /> <br />The 6th Avenue Bridge is overtopped in the 100-year flood. The inadequate <br />capacity of this bridge to pass floodwaters causes an increase in water sur- <br />face elevation which results in upstream flooding of the left, or west, bank <br />area. The recommended improvement for this bridge is to include reconstruc- <br />tion to raise the lowest part of the bridge, as well as enlarge the area <br />under the bridge. The channel under the bridge would be lowered and the <br />foundations of the piers and abutments would be lowered and strengthened. <br />The Colorado Highway Department is currently developing plans for the <br />rebuilding of the Interstate 25/6th Avenue interchange. However, none of <br />the alternatives being seriously considered by the Highway D~partment con- <br />template rebuilding of the 6th Avenue Bridge to improve its hydraulic capac- <br />ity. <br /> <br />The pedestrian bridge at Interstate 25 would be modified with a new bridge <br />to remove the center pier and widen the distance between the left and right <br />abutments. A new bridge closer to the Childt'en's Museum could also be con- <br />sidered. The current bridge, although it is a breakaway type bridge, re- <br />sults in an obstruction to flood flows due to the presence of a pier in the <br />channel and excessive fill at the right abutment. The Interstate 25 bridge <br />hydraulic cross section is constricted with fill. This fill should be <br />removed and replaced with rock riprap at a steeper slope to increase the hy- <br />draulic capacity of this bridge opening. <br /> <br />Although not necessary from a flood control standpoint, removal of the rub- <br />ble dam upstream of Florida Avenue could reduce the magnitude of the modifi- <br />cations required to the Evans Avenue Bridge to prevent flooding. <br /> <br />From the Third Avenue Dam to Colfax the capacity of the channel is exceeded <br />by the 100-year flood. To increase the capacity of the channel this alter- <br />native would include deepening the channel by 3 feet and reShaping the <br />banks. In order to lower the channel by 3 feet, utilities crossing the <br />channel would have to be relocated. These include a 3~-inch water line at <br />4th Avenue, a 48-inch water line at 11th Avenue, a 54-inch water line at <br />12th Avenue, an 8-inch gas line at 13th Street, and a l2-inch water line at <br />14th Avenue. From approximately 12th Avenue to 9th Avenue, it will be <br />necessary to replace the existing channel with a deepened channel, about 150 <br />feet wide with vertical walled sides 13.5 feet high. From 3rd Avenue to <br />Colfax, the banks of the river would have buried riprap with topsoil and <br />natural vegation on top. The bridges at 13th Avenue and 14th Avenue would <br />be modified to provide additional capacity and hydraulic efficiency. Recon- <br />struction of the 13th Avenue Bridge should include raising of the low chord <br />above the design flood water surface. The Public Service Company's inflat- <br />able dam downstream of 13th Street might also be rebuilt at a lower eleva- <br />tion to accommodate the channel improvements, though this will be studied in <br />greater detail in Phase B work to derive the optimum balance. <br /> <br />Reach 5 - Colfax to Cherry Creek. The limited structural improvement alter- <br />native for this reach includes modifying the channel generally according to <br />the cross section shown in Figure XII-I. This cross section allows suffi- <br />cient channel capacity to contain the 100-year flood when the existing chan- <br />nel bottom is lowered. To accommodate the lowered channel the 18-inch sewer <br />1 ine at 7th Street would be reconstructed or relocated. In addition, the <br />15th Street Dam (Farmers and Gardeners Oi tch Divers ion Dam) may al so be <br />replaced with an inflatable dam that could be lowered in times of flood. <br />The existing boat chute would remain as it currently exists. The need to <br />replace the Farmers and Gardeners diversion dam will be considered further <br />in Phase B. The other improvements listed may be adequate without replacing <br />the dam. <br /> <br />Consideration has been given to constructing a flood channel from Interstate <br />25 to a point in Cherry Creek about 1,000 feet above its mouth in lieu of <br />replacing the Farmers and Gardeners Ditch Diversion Dam. This flood channel <br />would be about 1 mile long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep with vertical <br />sides to reduce right-of-way requirements. This channel could be designed <br />in such a way that it would provide a focal point for restaurants, shops and <br />walks. During times of low flow, water could be maintained in this channel <br />by pumping groundwater near the head of the channel. The disadvantage of <br />this subalternative is that it may require modifications to the Cherry Creek <br />channel through Confluence Park to increase its capacity. Under existing <br />conditions, if a 100-year flood were to occur on Cherry Creek simulatane- <br />