Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />No structures provide flood protection in the Town of Erie. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the communi ty, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, SO-, 100-, or SOO-year period (recurrence interval) have been <br />selected as having special significance for floodplain management and <br />for flood insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, SO-, <br />100-, and SOO-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although the <br />recurrence interval represents the long-term avera2e period between <br />floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short <br />intervals or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare <br />flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For <br />example, the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the 100-year <br />flood (l percent chance of annual exceedence) in any SO-year period is <br />approximately 40 percent (4 in 10), and for any 90-year period, the risk <br />increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses reported <br />herein reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the <br />community at the time of completion of this study. Maps and flood <br />elevations will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each flooding source studied in detail <br />affecting the community. <br /> <br />The peak discharges for the 10-, SO-, 100-, and SOO-year floods for <br />Coal Creek used in this study were developed by the SCS in a report <br />entitled Flood Hazard Analvses. Coal Creek and Rock Creek. Boulder <br />and Weld Counties. Colorado (Reference I). The SCS used synthetic <br />rainfall-runoff procedures, as described in the SCS's National <br />En2ineerin2 Handbook (Reference 4), and the TR-20 computer program <br />for flood routing (Reference S) in order to establish the selected <br />discharges along the stream. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for Coal Creek are shown <br />in Table I. <br /> <br />Analyses were carried out to establish the peak elevation-frequency <br />relationships for each flooding source studied in detail. <br /> <br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding <br />sources studied were carried out to provide estimates <br />elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />from <br />of <br /> <br />the <br />the <br /> <br />S <br />