Laserfiche WebLink
<br />X-3 <br /> <br />19. Infiltration test~ performed during Phase A Indicated an average in- <br />filtration rate for existing conditions of Orle inch per hour; however, <br />for design purposes under future development" an Infiltration rate of <br />0.75 Inches per hour was used. <br /> <br />20. The peak '"ate of runoff was determIned to var"y from 250 cfs to 14,000 <br />cfs for the 100-year return frequency under full urbanization. <br /> <br />21. During Phase A, Mr. Ronald H. Strahle was retained to provide a legal <br />opinion as to the I Iabll itles of each of the alternates considered. <br />Alternates I and 2 have the least 1 iabil ity In that governmental en- <br />tities are not required to construct facil itles to alleviate storm <br />drainage problems, Alternate 3 has greater 1 iabll ity than Alternates <br />I and 2 in that once facilities are constructed, the governmental <br />entitles lIre then charged with responsibll ity to have designed them <br />properly llnd to maintain them In proper working condition. Alternates <br />4 and 6 carry the greatest liability and the responsibility to maintain <br />the existing channel Is not allevi,sted due to the construction of either <br />of the alternates. Alternate 5 can be considered an Integral part of <br />any of the preceding alternates. The 'liabilities associated with Alter- <br />nate 5 are, governed by the same general prlndples as the previous <br />alternates. <br /> <br />22. Design criteria were established for Big Dry Creek and reflect good <br />des i gn prclct I ces for prev I ous I y accepte,d standards and new requ i re- <br />ments due to the unique nature of "preventIve" storm draInage planning <br />and aesthe,tlc water-related opportunities. Ilost important of the cri- <br />ter I a is that re I ated to natura I channe 1 s as the des i gn app roach was <br />one of flood plain zoning. Grass-lined artIficial channeis will be <br />used where, channel modifications are necessar"y near brIdges, Trickle <br />channels for 250 cfs will be provided In the artificial channels <br />and they ~"ll be riprapped to provide channel stabll izatlon. <br /> <br />23. The report, at the concurrence of Adams County and WestmInster, does <br />not cover spec If ic deta lIs on the use of the flood p I a in as parks <br />and open space. <br /> <br />24. Provisions have been made for pedestrian pas!'age \~Ithout crossing over <br />major streets from the County Line Road throughout the iength of Big <br />Dry Creek up to Standley Lake. <br /> <br />25. The clear water releases from Standley Lake 1ll1d Gr"eat Western Reser- <br />voir provide a unique opportunity roo h,sve a "I ive" meandering stream <br />throughout much of the year In an area that Is rapidly urbanizing. <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br />Gablon <br />length <br />of Big <br /> <br />or concrete low flow erosion controls are shown throughout the <br />of Big Dry Creek to prevent, present dCl\~nward-cutt i ng trends <br />Dry Creek. (Sheets 7 and 2:q. <br />