Laserfiche WebLink
<br />111-2 <br /> <br />Section. No attempt would be made under thi's alternate to structurally <br />reduce flooding to existIng structures, roads, bridges, sewer plants, <br />or IrrIgation ditches. The resultIng damages are in an annual cost <br />form by studying the resulting flood plain of three or four different <br />flood frequences. With this alte;-nate, the effort is primarily aimed <br />at adoptIng appropriate regulations. In addi tlon to flood damages, <br />there are certain maintenance requirements associated with erosIon <br />and channel cleaning for irrigatIon flows. <br /> <br />2. Flood Plain Zonln with Minimal Struqural i.!nprovements - (Semi-Non- <br />Structural Alternative This alterno~te Is based on the 100-year <br />flood plain under projected future developmE,nt as It would be ollhen <br />culvert, brIdge and related Improvements are made: <br /> <br />a. Where for economic and/or sociologic re"SOns I t is prudent to <br />reduce the flood plaIn width. <br /> <br />b. Where for reasons of economics and of meeting street overtopping <br />requl rements, I t Is necessary to raise E,rnbankments and to COn- <br />struct bridges or culverts, even though the flood pialn width <br />I s no t reduced. <br /> <br />The economl c criterion for the above (and for subsequent a I ter- <br />nates) Is that the resulting annu;;ll cost of constructIon and reduced <br />level of maintenance Is less than the annual dam<.ges and maintenance <br />If the Improvements were not made. Hl!retofore, few relIable attempts <br />have been made at estimating benefits for thl! sociological, recrea- <br />tional, and road criteria. Selectlve'ly, rOeld, socIological and <br />recreational criteria may prevail in some arl!as even though economic <br />criteria may show an alternate to be l!conomically less desirable. <br /> <br />Because of the traffic and other urban requi rements related to <br />the criteria of the Drainage Criteria Manual" the bridges and street <br />crossings On Big Dry Creek wi 11 bE' replaced, or expanded, and most of <br />the flooding adjacent to roads wi 11 bE' reduced in the normai course <br />of urban development. What remains, then, Is the damage to specific <br />existing structures, bridges, embankm.mts, end other flood-susceptible <br />appurtenances and property. <br /> <br />For this al ternate, the design approach Is essentially non- <br />structural. Channel work Is primarily that <Issociated with bridge <br />and hIghway work, which would be done '1Ilth or without il flood hazard <br />problem to solve. <br /> <br />3. LIned Open Channel. In many already urbanized ar'eas, lined op.m <br />channels, especially grass-lIned and European-type, have become a <br />desIrable means of achieving multI-USE' greenbelts. However, arti- <br />ficial open channels are usually justl fied only when the natur<ll <br />channel no longer exists. <br />