Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11-3 <br /> <br />With the exception of 1-25 and U. S, 36, the existing bridges are generally <br />too narrow for the traffic and inappropriate for thel r projected use. <br />Except for Isolated cases, the floodway and floodplain a,'e generally In- <br />tact with little encroachment from land development. In some instances, <br />"hydraulically small" bridges and high embankmen1:s combine to cause <br />flooding to areas which wi 11 not normally be flooded by a given storm, <br />such as that from the lOO-year return design frequency storm determined <br />to be appropriate for use in this Prel imlnary De,j Ign durin~1 Phase A. <br /> <br />There are a variety of public and private enti ties involved di rectly <br />and indirectly with this study. Some of these include: <br /> <br />Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />Adams County <br />City of Westminster <br />Jefferson County <br />Colorado and Southern Railroad <br />Union Pacific Railroad <br />City of Broomfield <br />Colorado Department of HIghways <br />Sanitation Water Districts <br />Water User's Assoclatlons <br />Federal Aviation Administration (Jefferson ::ounty Airport) <br />The Department of Defense, Unlted States of America <br />Numerous private land owners, businesses, corporations, and <br />Irrigation companies <br /> <br />Historically, large damaging floods have not been cause for noticing <br />Blg Dry Creek as a hlstorl cal drainage problem. Due to the presently <br />undeveloped nature of the basln, damage to structures has been confined <br />to low-cost, not too greatly used bridges and to irdgation diversion <br />structures. As the basin develops, large damagi ng floods wi 1 i become <br />more frequent, since urbanization has its most noticeable effect on <br />runoff from storms of lesser return frequencies. Hand in hand with <br />urbanization without olannIng is the Increased Inconvenience due to mo,'e <br />frequently occurring high rates of runoff; the more critical importance of <br />maintainIng normal and emergency access aCI'oss Big Dry Creek; i1nd the <br />more frequent damage to structures which could be bul It In the flood- <br />plain. <br /> <br />Two embankments are cause for concern" At the lower end of the <br />basin Is the Union PacIfic Railroad embankment, '"hich is 35 feet in <br />height and Is of earthen construction. Near the upper end of the basin, <br />Sheridan Boulevard rises 24 feet above the channel bottom. Under future <br />urbanization, both embankments woul d be oV'Htopped, resul tl ng in greater <br />flooding than would historically occur. I t is Important to note that <br />both embankments, and especially the Union Pacific embankment, have a <br />profound effect In reducing the dOwnstream floodplain. It Is also Impor- <br />tant to note that total elimlnatlon of the constrictions caused by these <br />embankments would cause an IncreaSe In the floodplain area and would be <br />most noticeable in Weld County. <br />