Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />miles long. The headwaters of the drainage is at elevation 13,9~0 <br />feet so the average slope of the river is 200 feet of drop per mile. <br />The slope is actually much steeper in the upper half of the drainage <br />and flatter in the lower half. <br />The drainage area is separated into two major subbasins which <br />are the Pine River and Vallecito Creek; the size of the two <br />subbasins are about 150 and 100 square miles repectively. <br />The vegetation in the drainage area is alpine trees, brush, <br />grasses. The area is well vegetated and a significant amount <br />runoff will be retained in the drainage because of that. <br />The only major structure in the r'iver basin upst>'eam of the <br />subdivision is Vallecito Reservoir, which is a 120,000 acre-foot <br />reservoir, constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1940. The <br />dam is operated by the Pine River Irrigation District. When the dam <br />was constructed there was very 1 i tt Ie development below the darn so <br />thet'e were no appreciable flood ber,efits to justify flood stot'age in <br />the reservoir. As a resylt there is no flood capacity in the <br />reservoir to contain a 100 year fle,od unless the fle,od occured when <br />the reservoir was not full. Generally, major flood events OCcur in <br />the late summer and fall from rainstorms and since this is the <br />pet'iod when the reset'voir is riot full due to SUmmer irrigatiorl <br />releases, there is an excellent chance that the reservoir would be <br />able to significantly reduce the 100 year flood peak. In the past <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) has said that <br />incidental reservoir flood storage carlrlot be considered LlYIless there <br />is a flood storage allocation. <br />The reservoir and spillway were designed to pass the "inflow <br />design flood" which is a flood eve'nt far greater than the 100 year <br />flood. To pass this flood the reservoir has a few feet of surcharge <br />above the normal higH water surface and the spillway is capable of <br />passing 30,000 cfs. The 100 year flood is sufficiently small, <br />compared to the "inflow design flood", that the surcharge would not <br />be used but the flood would pass through the reservoir and the <br />spillway if the reservoir were full. As will be described, the 100 <br />year flood is less than the spillway capacity. <br /> <br />arid <br />of <br /> <br />FLOOD ESTIMATION <br /> <br />Based on maps prepared by the F'ederal I::mergency Management <br />Agency for the National Flood Insurance Program dated December 15, <br />1981, the entire subdivision is in the 100 year flood plain. This <br />map is very general and does not show the depths of water nor the <br />elevations of the floodplain boundary. In order to determine the <br />flood depths and boundaries, the first step is to estimate the <br />instantaneous 100 year peak-f'lood flow. The flow will be estimated <br />in cfs; the volume of the flood is not important and will not be <br />estirnated. <br />The exist ing flood data for the ar'ea ir,cludes: 1) "Floe,d Hazard <br />Information" study prepared by the Corp of Engineers for Vallecito <br />Creek in April 1975 arid 2) "Flood Insur'ance Study" prepared for the <br />Town of Bayfield for the Federal Insurance Administration. The <br />first study was prepared to delineate the flood plain for Vallecito <br />Creek above the the reservoir where there is a significant amount of <br />development. This study estimated a 100 year flood peak of 11,000 <br />cfs where Vallecito Creek enters the reservoir. Vallecito Creek <br />drains about 40%, 100 square miles of the 250 square mile drainage <br />